Peri-implant reconstruction using autologous periosteum-derived cells and guided bone regeneration

被引:11
|
作者
Ribeiro, Fernanda Vieira [1 ]
Suaid, Fabricia Ferreira [1 ]
Silverio Ruiz, Karina Gonzales [1 ]
Rodrigues, Thaisangela Lopes [1 ]
Carvalho, Marcelo Diniz [1 ]
Nociti, Francisco Humberto [1 ]
Sallum, Enilson Antonio [1 ]
Casati, Marcio Zaffalon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Dent Piracicaba, Dept Prosthodont & Periodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
dental implants; e-PTFE membrane; guided bone regeneration; periosteum; tissue engineering; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; DEHISCENCE-TYPE DEFECTS; VERTICAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION; CULTURED PERIOSTEUM; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; TISSUE REGENERATION; COLLAGEN MEMBRANES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ADIPOSE-TISSUE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01635.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
P>Aim This investigation evaluated the bone healing in peri-implant defects treated with periosteum-derived cells (PCs) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Material and Methods PCs were harvested from six beagle dogs and characterized in vitro with regard to their osteogenic properties. The animals were subjected to teeth extraction in the mandible, and after 3 months of healing, implant sites were drilled, bone dehiscences were created and implants were placed. Dehiscences were randomly assigned to: PCs+GBR, GBR, PCs and non-treated defects. After 3 months, the implants/adjacent tissues were processed. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) bone fill (BF) within implant threads, and bone area (BA) in a zone lateral to the implant were obtained. Results In vitro analyses confirmed the osteogenic potential of PCs. Histometrically, no statistically significant differences were observed among the PCs+GBR, GBR and PCs groups for both BF and BIC (p > 0.05), whereas these groups showed statistically higher values, as compared with the non-treated group (p < 0.05). With respect to BA, the PCs+GBR and GBR groups presented significantly higher means, as compared with the PCs and non-treated groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion Although successful outcomes have been promoted by using the combined approach, PCs in conjunction with membranes did not provide additional benefit during peri-implant bone regeneration, when compared with the therapeutic approaches used alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1136
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periosteum-derived Micrografts for bone regeneration
    Mahardawi, Basel
    Tompkins, Kevin A.
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH, 2023, 64 (04) : 400 - 412
  • [2] Management of peri-implant bone loss using guided bone regeneration: A clinical report
    Tomson, PLM
    Butterworth, CJ
    Walmsley, AD
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (01): : 12 - 16
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells and Periosteum-Derived Cells for Bone Regeneration
    Zhu, Jingxian
    Xiong, Jiabi
    Ji, Wei
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS, 2023, 29 (02) : 103 - 122
  • [4] Effective bone engineering with periosteum-derived cells
    Agata, H.
    Asahina, I.
    Yamazaki, Y.
    Uchida, M.
    Shinohara, Y.
    Honda, M. J.
    Kagami, H.
    Ueda, M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 86 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [5] A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
    Artas, Gokhan
    Gul, Mehmet
    Acikan, Izzet
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Simsek, Sercan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Dundar, Serkan
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [6] Peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs
    Shanbhag, Siddharth
    Sanz-Esporrin, Javier
    Kampleitner, Carina
    Lie, Stein-Atle
    Gruber, Reinhard
    Mustafa, Kamal
    Sanz, Mariano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [7] Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes
    Benic, Goran I.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Munoz, Fernando
    Sanz Martin, Ignacio
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (05) : 567 - 576
  • [8] Evaluation of the Effects of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-Implant Bone Defect
    Kobat, Mehmet Ali
    Dundar, Serkan
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Gelen, Mehmet Ali
    Artas, Gokhan
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Tasdemir, Ismail
    Karasu, Mehdi
    Habek, Osman
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (05) : 1590 - 1594
  • [9] Evaluation of the Effects of Systemic Irisin Application on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-implant Bone Defects
    Bulmus, Ozgur
    Dundar, Serkan
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Artas, Gokhan
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Canpolat, Sinan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : 2272 - 2275
  • [10] SUCCESSFUL BONE FILL IN LATE PERI-IMPLANT DEFECTS USING GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION - A SHORT COMMUNICATION
    HAMMERLE, CHF
    FOURMOUSIS, I
    WINKLER, JR
    WEIGEL, C
    BRAGGER, U
    LANG, NP
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1995, 66 (04) : 303 - 308