COMPARISON OF PREFABRICATED BIOGAS DIGESTER AND TRADITIONAL BIOGAS DIGESTER - BASED ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

被引:0
作者
Cheng, Shikun [1 ]
Zhao, Mingyue [2 ]
Wang, Xuemei [1 ]
Shang, Honglei [3 ]
Uddin, Sayed Mohammad Nazim [1 ]
Li, Zifu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Beijing Key Lab Resource Oriented Treatment Ind P, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Municipal Environm Monitoring Ctr, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
来源
OXIDATION COMMUNICATIONS | 2016年 / 39卷 / 1A期
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
life cycle assessment; prefabricated biogas digester; environmental impact; biogas; digestate; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; DEPLOYMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
China plays a leading role in the worldwide development and dissemination of household-based biogas technology, no matter traditional biogas digester or prefabricated biogas digester (PBD). Life cycle assessment of traditional onsite-constructed (OC) digester, glass fibre reinforced plastics (FRP) digester and plastic soft (PS) digester with the same volume of 8 m(3) was implemented. The environmental impact of OC digester is the highest while the environmental impact of PS digester is the lowest. The environmental impact comprehensive indexes (EICIs) of OC digester, FRP digester and PS digester within the lifetime are 8.6 x 10(-2), 6.72 x 10(-2) and 6.16 x 10(-3), respectively. The EICI is 3.23 x 10(-4) for each m3 biogas production while the EICI is 6.45 x 10(-4) for each kg dry matter digestate production. The EICIs of 1 ton digestate application and chemical fertiliser application are -2.14 and 0.127, respectively. In order to reduce the environmental impact of PBD which adopts chemical materials, it is suggested that environment-friendly material be used.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1024
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation-An overview [J].
Abbasi, Tasneem ;
Tauseef, S. M. ;
Abbasi, S. A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (05) :3228-3242
[2]  
[Anonymous], CHINA DAIRY CATTLE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
[4]   Agricultural application of life cycle iNdeX (LInX) for effective decision making [J].
Bailey, Julie A. ;
Amyotte, Paul ;
Khan, Faisal I. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (16-17) :1703-1713
[5]  
Bjelajac Z, 2015, OXID COMMUN, V38, P722
[6]   Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization [J].
Chen, Shaoqing ;
Chen, Bin ;
Song, Dan .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 114 :357-364
[7]   Household biogas use in rural China: A study of opportunities and constraints [J].
Chen, Yu ;
Yang, Gaihe ;
Sweeney, Sandra ;
Feng, Yongzhong .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (01) :545-549
[8]   A review of prefabricated biogas digesters in China [J].
Cheng, Shikun ;
Li, Zifu ;
Mang, Heinz-Peter ;
Huba, Elisabeth-Maria .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 28 :738-748
[9]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451
[10]  
DENG N., 2003, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN