Writing for scientific journals II: The review process

被引:0
|
作者
Jaeger, RG
Toft, CA
机构
[1] Univ SW Louisiana, Dept Biol, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Sect Evolut & Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
editors; manuscripts; peer review; referees; writing for publication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The peer-review process is based on a series of evaluations by referees and decisions by editors. Our essay is intended for graduate students M ho are composing their first manuscripts for publication and who wish to experience superior evaluations and favorable editorial decisions, We briefly describe the review process and provide hints on how to catch the redder's attention. We then describe 15 fatal flaws often detected by referees and editors. Our goal is to provide the student with some insight into the invisible aspects of the review process and, thus, to enhance the likelihood that the manuscripts will be published.
引用
收藏
页码:S54 / S63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?
    Garcia, Manuel B.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 52 (02) : 139 - 140
  • [42] In ... and Out: Open Access Publishing in Scientific Journals
    Boumil, Marcia M.
    Salem, Deeb N.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 23 (03) : 133 - 137
  • [43] Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?
    Manuel B. Garcia
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2024, 52 : 139 - 140
  • [44] Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals
    Barata, Rita Barradas
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (03): : 929 - 939
  • [45] EVALUATION METHODS OF SCIENTIFIC ECONOMIC JOURNALS QUALITY
    Balatsky, Evgeny, V
    Ekimova, Natalia A.
    Tretyackova, Olga, V
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 13 (02) : 27 - 52
  • [46] AN ALGORITHM TO SUPPORT THE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF CHATGPT
    Rashidov, Aldeniz
    STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION-STRATEGII NA OBRAZOVATELNATA I NAUCHNATA POLITIKA, 2024, 32 (06): : 669 - 681
  • [47] A new Form for the Evaluation of Scientific Articles under Peer Review
    Sabaj Meruane, Omar
    Gonzalez Vergara, Carlos
    Varas Espinoza, German
    Pina-Stranger, Alvaro
    ARGOS, 2015, 32 (62) : 119 - 130
  • [48] Writing for Publication in Medical Education in High Impact Journals
    Azer, S. A.
    Dupras, D. M.
    Azer, S.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (19) : 2966 - 2981
  • [49] Pro-active peer review for premier journals
    Lim, Weng Marc
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 95 : 65 - 69
  • [50] A "Trojan Horse" in the peer-review process of fee-charging economic journals
    Dell'Anno, Roberto
    Caferra, Rocco
    Morone, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2020, 14 (03)