Writing for scientific journals II: The review process

被引：0
|
作者：
Jaeger, RG
Toft, CA
机构：
[1] Univ SW Louisiana, Dept Biol, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Sect Evolut & Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源：
HERPETOLOGICA | 1998年 / 54卷
关键词：
editors; manuscripts; peer review; referees; writing for publication;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号：
071002 ;
摘要：
The peer-review process is based on a series of evaluations by referees and decisions by editors. Our essay is intended for graduate students M ho are composing their first manuscripts for publication and who wish to experience superior evaluations and favorable editorial decisions, We briefly describe the review process and provide hints on how to catch the redder's attention. We then describe 15 fatal flaws often detected by referees and editors. Our goal is to provide the student with some insight into the invisible aspects of the review process and, thus, to enhance the likelihood that the manuscripts will be published.
引用
收藏
页码：S54 / S63
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONCEPTUAL DEBATES AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ABOUT THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS FOR SCHOLARLY JOURNALS
    Thomas, Sandra P.
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2011, 27 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [22] On the peer review process in scientific publication
    Yucel, Dogan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY-TURK BIYOKIMYA DERGISI, 2012, 37 (02): : 212 - 214
  • [23] Scientific biomedical journals in Croatia
    Misak, A
    Petrak, J
    Pecina, M
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 43 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [24] Peer Review Interactions for Malaysian Journals: The Revamped Open-Peer Review Process
    Ahmad, Jasni
    Shiratuddin, Norshuhada
    WCECS 2008: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, : 487 - 490
  • [25] A Process Writing Platform with Peer Review Function for EFL
    Huang, Yong
    Li, Yinling
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCES AND SOCIETY (ICSSS 2013), PT 1, 2013, 32 : 303 - 307
  • [26] Exploring peer-review (PR) patterns for supplementary material (SM) in scientific journals
    Hoda, Ubedul
    Gutha, Himabindu
    Patil, Madhavi
    Shah, Vatsal
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 : S20 - S21
  • [27] Peer review as a strategy for improving students' writing process
    Baker, Kimberly M.
    ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (03) : 179 - 192
  • [28] A New Method and Metric to Evaluate the Peer Review Process of Scholarly Journals
    Etkin, Adam
    PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2014, 30 (01) : 23 - 38
  • [29] Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing
    Zhang, Guangyao
    Xu, Shenmeng
    Sun, Yao
    Jiang, Chunlin
    Wang, Xianwen
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2022, 16 (02)
  • [30] A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
12345