Writing for scientific journals II: The review process

被引:0
|
作者
Jaeger, RG
Toft, CA
机构
[1] Univ SW Louisiana, Dept Biol, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Sect Evolut & Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biol Sci, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
editors; manuscripts; peer review; referees; writing for publication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The peer-review process is based on a series of evaluations by referees and decisions by editors. Our essay is intended for graduate students M ho are composing their first manuscripts for publication and who wish to experience superior evaluations and favorable editorial decisions, We briefly describe the review process and provide hints on how to catch the redder's attention. We then describe 15 fatal flaws often detected by referees and editors. Our goal is to provide the student with some insight into the invisible aspects of the review process and, thus, to enhance the likelihood that the manuscripts will be published.
引用
收藏
页码:S54 / S63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process and quality of peer review in scientific Nursing journals
    Chien, Wai Tong
    NURSING REPORTS, 2011, 1 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [2] Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing
    Guilford, WH
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2001, 25 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [3] Authors' roundtable: scientific writing, peer review, and publication across journals
    Bradt, Joke
    Baker, Felicity
    Bergmann, Thomas
    Bonde, Lars Ole
    Clark, Imogen
    Gold, Christian
    Loewy, Joanne
    McFerran, Katrina
    Meadows, Anthony
    Robb, Sheri
    Vaillancourt, Guylaine
    Alexis, ElisaBeth
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF MUSIC THERAPY, 2016, 25 : 86 - 87
  • [4] Writing for scientific journals I: The manuscript
    Toft, CA
    Jaeger, RG
    HERPETOLOGICA, 1998, 54 : S42 - S54
  • [5] The peer-review process to ensure the quality of scientific journals
    Lopez Jordi, Maria del Carmen
    Piovesan, Sylvia
    Pereira-Prado, Vanesa
    Patron, Carina
    Limas, Anahi
    ODONTOESTOMATOLOGIA, 2019, 21 (34):
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the scientific review process in nursing journals time for a rethink?
    Jasper, Melanie
    Vaismoradi, Mojtaba
    Bondas, Terese
    Turunen, Hannele
    NURSING INQUIRY, 2014, 21 (02) : 92 - 100
  • [7] The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact
    Paine, C. E. Timothy
    Fox, Charles W.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (19): : 9566 - 9585
  • [8] Quality assessment of Spanish scientific journals: analysis of their review processes
    Coslado, Maria-Angeles
    Lacunza, Izaskun
    Ros, German
    PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2011, 20 (02): : 159 - 164
  • [9] Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
    Sprowson, A. P.
    Rankin, K. S.
    McNamara, I.
    Costa, M. L.
    Rangan, A.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (11): : 245 - 247
  • [10] Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals
    Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
    Rey-Brandariz, Julia
    Varela-Lema, Leonor
    Perez-Rios, Monica
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2023, 99 (01): : 54 - 59