Internet-based interpersonal psychotherapy for stress, anxiety, and depression in prenatal women: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:15
作者
Bright, Katherine S. [1 ]
Mughal, Muhammad Kashif [1 ]
Wajid, Abdul [1 ]
Lane-Smith, Marie [1 ]
Murray, Lindsay [1 ]
Roy, Nicola [1 ]
Van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen [2 ]
Mcneil, Deborah A. [1 ,3 ]
Stuart, Scott [1 ,4 ]
Kingston, Dawn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
[3] Alberta Hlth Serv, Maternal Newborn Child & Youth Strateg Clin Netwo, Southport Atrium 2237,10101 Southport Rd SW, Calgary, AB T2W 3N2, Canada
[4] Interpersonal Psychotherapy IPT Inst, POB 5925, Coralville, IA 52241 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Perinatal women; Interpersonal psychotherapy; Psychological distress; Mental health; Internet; Online; Depression; Stress; Anxiety; BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION-TREATMENT; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; THERAPY; MOOD; IPT; ASSOCIATIONS; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-019-3897-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Psychological distress, defined as depression, anxiety and perceived stress, during pregnancy is common, with 15-25% of women experiencing clinically significant levels of such distress. Despite the far-reaching impact of prenatal psychological distress on mothers and their children, and that women are receptive to screening, few providers routinely screen for prenatal psychological distress and less than one in five women will receive the mental health care that they require. There is a lack of certainty regarding the most effective treatments for prenatal psychological distress. No online interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) trials have been conducted that focus on improving psychological distress in prenatal women. The purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the perspectives of pregnant women on the feasibility and acceptability of online IPT (e-IPT) delivered during pregnancy. Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial design with repeated measures will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of e-IPT for pregnant women compared to routine prenatal care. Qualitative interviews with 15-30 individuals in the intervention group will provide further data on the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Assessment of feasibility will include the ease of accessing and completing the intervention. Women will also be asked about what barriers there were to starting and completing the e-IPT. Assessment of acceptability will inquire about the perception of women regarding the intervention and its various features. A sample size of 160 consenting pregnant women aged 18 years and older will be enrolled and randomized into the experimental (e-IPT) or control (routine care) condition. The secondary outcome measures include: depression, anxiety and stress symptoms; self-efficacy; self-mastery; self-esteem; relationship quality (spouse, immediate family members); coping; and resilience. All participants will complete the aforementioned measures at baseline during pregnancy (T-1), 3 months postrandomization (T-2), at 8 months of pregnancy (T-3), and 3 months postpartum (T-4). Discussion: The results of this pilot randomized controlled trial will provide data on the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and identify necessary adaptations. This study will allow for optimization of full trial processes and inform the evaluation strategy, including sample size calculations for the full randomized controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Akin A., 2007, Educ Sci Theory Pract, V7, P260
[2]   A systematic review of systematic reviews of interventions to improve maternal mental health and well-being [J].
Alderdice, Fiona ;
McNeill, Jenny ;
Lynn, Fiona .
MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (04) :389-399
[3]   Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Andrews, Gavin ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Craske, Michelle G. ;
McEvoy, Peter ;
Titov, Nickolai .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10)
[4]  
Andrews G, 2010, MED J AUSTRALIA, V192, pS45
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, J Reprod Infant Psychol, DOI DOI 10.1080/02646839008403615
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, AHRQ publication
[7]  
[Anonymous], FOCUS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, J NURSING
[9]  
[Anonymous], TRIALS
[10]   The Antenatal Risk Questionnaire (ANRQ): Acceptability and use for psychosocial risk assessment in the maternity setting [J].
Austin, Marie-Paule ;
Colton, Jana ;
Priest, Susan ;
Reilly, Nicole ;
Hadzi-Pavlovic, Dusan .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2013, 26 (01) :17-25