Decision making on investments in photovoltaic power generation projects based on renewable portfolio standard: Perspective of real option

被引:31
作者
Wang Bangjun [1 ]
Feng, Zhaolei [1 ]
Feng, Ji [1 ]
Yu, Pan [1 ]
Cui, Linyu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard(RPS); Photovoltaic power generation; Sequential investment decision; Real option; FEED-IN TARIFFS; ENERGY INVESTMENT; UNITED-STATES; ELECTRICITY; MARKET; POLICY; UNCERTAINTY; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is now a main global trend to replace the renewable energy feed-in tariffs (FIT) policy with the renewable portfolio system (RPS) policy in the reform of renewable energy policy systems. To solve the practical problem that the current main studies on the decision making about investments by renewable energy enterprises mainly focus on macroeconomic aspects such as government subsidies, renewable energy FIT and carbon taxes, rather than microeconomic aspects such as RPS and the TGC market's influence, a real option model about photovoltaic power generation projects is established to study these projects' sequential decision making about optimal investment opportunity, optimal installed capacity and phased investment. The result shows that phased investment fruit in much higher investment flexibility, longer economic lives and greater project values, and fewer risks for investors as well; lower technical costs and higher TGC prices help acquire the optimal investment opportunities. The conclusions of this study help make better decision making about investments in photovoltaic power generation projects and, from the microcosmic aspect, prove influence of the RPS policy. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1045
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, World energy outlook 2021
[2]   No real option for solar in Ireland: A real option valuation of utility scale solar investment in Ireland [J].
Assereto, Martina ;
Byrne, Julie .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 143
[3]   A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of US renewable portfolio standards [J].
Barbose, Galen ;
Wiser, Ryan ;
Heeter, Jenny ;
Mai, Trieu ;
Bird, Lori ;
Bolinger, Mark ;
Carpenter, Alberta ;
Heath, Garvin ;
Keyser, David ;
Macknick, Jordan ;
Mills, Andrew ;
Millstein, Dev .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 :645-660
[4]   Costs and benefits of renewables portfolio standards in the United States [J].
Barbose, Galen ;
Bird, Lori ;
Heeter, Jenny ;
Flores-Espino, Francisco ;
Wiser, Ryan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :523-533
[5]   Market and welfare effects of renewable portfolio standards in United States electricity markets [J].
Bhattacharya, Suparna ;
Giannakas, Konstantinos ;
Schoengold, Karina .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 :384-401
[6]   Solar Grid Parity dynamics in Italy: A real option approach [J].
Biondi, Tommaso ;
Moretto, Michele .
ENERGY, 2015, 80 :293-302
[7]   Economic policy instruments and market uncertainty: Exploring the impact on renewables adoption [J].
Blazquez, Jorge ;
Nezamuddin, Nora ;
Zamrik, Tamim .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :224-233
[8]  
Brainard W, 1967, AM ECON REV, V57, P411
[9]   Optimal regulation of renewable energy: A comparison of Feed-in Tariffs and Tradable Green Certificates in the Spanish electricity system [J].
Ciarreta, Aitor ;
Paz Espinosa, Maria ;
Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 :387-399
[10]   Health co-benefits of sub-national renewable energy policy in the US [J].
Dimanchev, Emil G. ;
Paltsev, Sergey ;
Yuan, Mei ;
Rothenberg, Daniel ;
Tessum, Christopher W. ;
Marshall, Julian D. ;
Selin, Noelle E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (08)