Does development of renewable energy reduce energy intensity? Evidence from 82 countries

被引:71
作者
Yu, Shiwei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Ctr Energy Environm Management & Decis Making, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy; Energy intensity; Renewable energy development regime; Dynamic panel threshold regression model; ECONOMIC-GROWTH EVIDENCE; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; PANEL-DATA; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-PROGRESS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121254
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, renewable energy (RE) has seen rapid development worldwide. However, energy intensity has not declined at the same rate. This study applies a dynamic panel threshold regression model to explore the effects of RE development on energy intensity in 82 major countries. The results show that RE development has a significantly negative impact on energy intensity. Specifically, for every 10.0% increase in RE development, energy intensity reduces by 0.3%. The threshold point of the effect is determined and estimated at 2.3588 (the equivalent RE consumption is 10.58 billion MJ) between the low and the high development regimes of RE. Every 10.0% increase in the development of RE leads to a 2.2% decrease in energy intensity in the high development regime, but only 0.2% decrease in the low development regime. Economic development has a significantly negative impact on energy intensity, while energy consumption structure based on non-renewable energy creates has a significantly positive impact. All countries should increase the consumption of renewable energy to more than 10.58 billion MJ to cut energy intensity and improve the technical content of international trade products, especially in low renewable energy development level regimes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels [J].
Ahmad, Munir ;
Isik, Cem ;
Jabeen, Gul ;
Ali, Tausif ;
Ozturk, Ilhan ;
Atchike, Desire Wade .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 765
[2]   Emission intensive growth and trade in the era of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) integration: An empirical investigation from ASEAN-8 [J].
Ahmed, Khalid ;
Bhattacharya, Mita ;
Shaikh, Zahid ;
Ramzan, Muhammad ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 154 :530-540
[3]   The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic cooperation and development countries [J].
Alam, Md. Mahmudul ;
Murad, Md. Wahid .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 :382-390
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REN POW GEN COSTS 20
[5]   The effect of financial development on renewable energy consumption. A panel data approach [J].
Anton, Sorin Gabriel ;
Nucu, Anca Elena Afloarei .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 147 :330-338
[6]   Does energy price affect energy efficiency? Cross-country panel evidence [J].
Antonietti, Roberto ;
Fontini, Fulvio .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :896-906
[7]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[8]   The Trends of the Energy Intensity and CO2 Emissions Related to Final Energy Consumption in Ecuador: Scenarios of National and Worldwide Strategies [J].
Arroyo M, Flavio R. ;
Miguel, Luis J. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
[9]   The long-term effect of renewable electricity on employment in the United Kingdom [J].
Arvanitopoulos, T. ;
Agnolucci, P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 134
[10]   Export product diversification and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from OECD countries [J].
Bashir, Muhammad Adnan ;
Sheng, Bin ;
Dogan, Buhari ;
Sarwar, Suleman ;
Shahzad, Umer .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 :232-243