A robust modified Gaussian mixture model with rough set for image segmentation

被引:31
作者
Ji, Zexuan [1 ]
Huang, Yubo [1 ]
Xia, Yong [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Yuhui [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Shaanxi Key Lab Speech & Image Informat Proc SAII, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Comp Sci, CMCC, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Comp & Software, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Image segmentation; Gaussian mixture model; Markov random field; Spatial information; Rough set theory; EM algorithm; C-MEANS ALGORITHM; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; MR-IMAGES; CLASSIFICATION; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.069
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Accurate image segmentation is an essential step in image processing, where Gaussian mixture models with spatial constraint play an important role and have been proven effective for image segmentation. Nevertheless, most methods suffer from one or more challenges such as limited robustness to outliers, over-smoothness for segmentations, sensitive to initializations and manually setting parameters. To address these issues and further improve the accuracy for image segmentation, in this paper, a robust modified Gaussian mixture model combining with rough set theory is proposed for image segmentation. Firstly, to make the Gaussian mixture models more robust to noise, a new spatial weight factor is constructed to replace the conditional probability of an image pixel with the calculation of the probabilities of pixels in its immediate neighborhood. Secondly, to further reduce the over-smoothness for segmentations, a novel prior factor is proposed by incorporating the spatial information amongst neighborhood pixels. Finally, each Gaussian component is characterized by three automatically determined rough regions, and accordingly the posterior probability of each pixel is estimated with respect to the region it locates. We compare our algorithm to state-of-the-art segmentation approaches in both synthetic and real images to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed algorithm. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 565
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 8 IEEE INT C COMPUTE, DOI [DOI 10.1109/ICCV.2001.937655, 10.1109/ICCV.2001.937655]
[2]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T NEURAL NETW L, DOI [10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2527796, DOI 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2527796]
[3]   Maximum likelihood estimation of Gaussian mixture models using stochastic search [J].
Ari, Caglar ;
Aksoy, Selim ;
Arikan, Orhan .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2012, 45 (07) :2804-2816
[4]  
Bishop C.M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, V4, P738, DOI DOI 10.1117/1.2819119
[5]   A spatially constrained mixture model for image segmentation [J].
Blekas, K ;
Likas, A ;
Galatsanos, NP ;
Lagaris, IE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2005, 16 (02) :494-498
[6]   Model-Based Learning Using a Mixture of Mixtures of Gaussian and Uniform Distributions [J].
Browne, Ryan P. ;
McNicholas, Paul D. ;
Sparling, Matthew D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 34 (04) :814-817
[7]   EM procedures using mean field-like approximations for Markov model-based image segmentation [J].
Celeux, G ;
Forbes, F ;
Peyrard, N .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2003, 36 (01) :131-144
[8]   Robust Subspace Segmentation Via Low-Rank Representation [J].
Chen, Jinhui ;
Yang, Jian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2014, 44 (08) :1432-1445
[9]   An improved anisotropic hierarchical fuzzy c-means method based on multivariate student t-distribution for brain MRI segmentation [J].
Chen, Yunjie ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Zheng, Yuhui ;
Jeon, Byeungwoo ;
Wu, Q. M. Jonathan .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2016, 60 :778-792
[10]   Automatic segmentation for brain MR images via a convex optimized segmentation and bias field correction coupled model [J].
Chen, Yunjie ;
Zhao, Bo ;
Zhang, Jianwei ;
Zheng, Yuhui .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (07) :941-955