Scale dependent variability of soil electrical conductivity by indirect measures of soil properties

被引:16
作者
Bekele, A
Hudnall, WH
Daigle, JJ
Prudente, JA
Wolcott, M
机构
[1] Tarleton State Univ, Texas Inst Appl Environm Res, Stephenville, TX 76401 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Agron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] USDA, NRCS, Alexandria, LA 71302 USA
关键词
scale; spatial variability; fractal dimension; semivariogram; soil electrical conductivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jterra.2004.12.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Knowledge of scale dependent variation of soil properties is important where upscaling and generalization from plot scale studies to field and larger scale is desired. We used conventional statistics, geostatistics and fractal analysis to characterize and compare the apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) of six contiguous agricultural fields each ranging between 9.5 and 14.0 ha in size. Factor analysis revealed that ECa was strongly related to ammonium extractable K, organic matter (OM), pH and Bray-2 Phosphorus, but not to ammonium extractable Ca and sum of bases. All six fields were spatially structured and well described by exponential semivariograms. Fractal dimensions estimated from the linear portion of the semivariogram using a linear plateau model were statistically different (p = 0.05) among some of the fields, and the differences may have been caused by management differences. Fractal analysis identified at least two scales of variation for the fields. The first scale of variation, common to all six fields, was for distances less than 9 m. The second scale of variation was for distances ranging between 9 and 46 m (field NC), 9 and 79 m (fields SC and SW); and 9 and 126 m (field SE). Two of the fields (fields NW and NE) did not have a plateau on the log-log plot of the semivariograms, indicating a scaling behavior at larger distances. The study showed that although the semivariogram forms are similar among the six fields, the rate of change of the semivariograms (as indicated by the fractal dimension) differs for some of the fields at distances greater than 9 m. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of ISTVS.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 351
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Barton C. C., 1995, FRACTALS PETROLEUM G, P317
[2]  
BASSINGHTHWAIGH.JB, 1994, FRACTAL PHYSL
[3]   Comparative evaluation of spatial prediction methods in a field experiment for mapping soil potassium [J].
Bekele, A ;
Downer, RG ;
Wolcott, MC ;
Hudnall, WH ;
Moore, SH .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2003, 168 (01) :15-28
[4]  
BIRIDI KS, 1993, FRACTALS CHEM GEOCHE
[5]   MULTISCALE SOURCES OF SPATIAL VARIATION IN SOIL .1. THE APPLICATION OF FRACTAL CONCEPTS TO NESTED LEVELS OF SOIL VARIATION [J].
BURROUGH, PA .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1983, 34 (03) :577-597
[6]   FRACTAL DIMENSIONS OF LANDSCAPES AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DATA [J].
BURROUGH, PA .
NATURE, 1981, 294 (5838) :240-242
[7]   FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS [J].
CAMBARDELLA, CA ;
MOORMAN, TB ;
NOVAK, JM ;
PARKIN, TB ;
KARLEN, DL ;
TURCO, RF ;
KONOPKA, AE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (05) :1501-1511
[8]  
COHEN WB, 1994, REMOTE SENSING AND GIS IN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT, P91
[9]  
Corwin DL, 2003, AGRON J, V95, P352, DOI 10.2134/agronj2003.0455
[10]   Assessment and field-scale mapping of soil quality properties of a saline-sodic soil [J].
Corwin, DL ;
Kaffka, SR ;
Hopmans, JW ;
Mori, Y ;
van Groenigen, JW ;
van Kessel, C ;
Lesch, SM ;
Oster, JD .
GEODERMA, 2003, 114 (3-4) :231-259