Comparative Approach of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Restrictions in Controlled Airspaces

被引：16

作者：

McTegg, Stephen John ^{[1
]}

Tarsha Kurdi, Fayez ^{[1
]}

Simmons, Shane ^{[1
]}

Gharineiat, Zahra ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Fac Hlth Engn & Sci, Sch Surveying & Built Environm, Springfield, Qld 4350, Australia

来源：

REMOTE SENSING | 2022年 / 14卷 / 04期

关键词：

unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); drone; regulations; restrictions; privacy; safety; CIVILIAN DRONES IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; ETHICS;

D O I：

10.3390/rs14040822

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Recent public discourse regarding unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage and regulation is focused around public privacy and safety. Most authorities have employed key guidelines and licensing procedures for piloting UAVs, however there is marginal consensus amongst regulators and a limited view towards unified procedures. This paper aims to analyze the key challenges that affect the use of UAVs and to determine if the current rules address those challenges. For this purpose: privacy, safety, security, public nuisance and trespass are tested. A set of criteria are developed to perform a comparative analysis against the existing UAV regulations to determine how they are meeting the specified criteria. Within this framework, five countries are selected: Australia, Canada, European Union (EU), United Kingdom (UK) and the United States of America (USA), with usage data and length of time between regulatory reviews ensuring any analysis is realized on updated protocols. The regulations of each country are then compared against the developed criteria. The findings show there are shortfalls with the majority of regulations failing to meet some criteria and the results confirm that key issues fail to be addressed. Finally, recommendations are suggested for filling the gaps in the regulations.

引用

页数：30

共 36 条

[21] The small unmanned aircraft blunt criterion based injury potential estimation [J].

Magister, Tone .

SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (10) :1313-1320

[22]

Mishra M., 2018, J KING SAUD U COMPUT

[23] Regulation and innovation: How should small unmanned aerial vehicles be regulated? [J].

Nakamura, Hiroko ;

Kajikawa, Yuya .

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 128 :262-274

[24] The View from Above: A Survey of the Public's Perception of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Privacy [J].

Nelson, Jake R. ;

Grubesic, Tony H. ;

Wallace, Danielle ;

Chamberlain, Alyssa W. .

JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) :83-105

[25]

Nunez-Mietz Fernando G., 2019, ASTM C618:2019

[26]

Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, 2017, AUSTR COMM ATT PRIV

[27] Analysis of the GPS Spoofing Vulnerability in the Drone 3DR Solo [J].

Perez Arteaga, Sandra ;

Martinez Hernandez, Luis Alberto ;

Sanchez Perez, Gabriel ;

Sandoval Orozco, Ana Lucila ;

Garcia Villalba, Luis Javier .

IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :51782-51789

[28] Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK [J].

Pomeroy, P. ;

O'Connor, L. ;

Davies, P. .

JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2015, 3 (03) :102-113

[29] Safe operation of mini UAVs: a review of regulation and best practices [J].

Sanz, D. ;

Valente, J. ;

del Cerro, J. ;

Colorado, J. ;

Barrientos, A. .

ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2015, 29 (19) :1221-1233

[30]

Shackle Samira., 2012, GUARDIAN

← 1 2 3 4 →