Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Urban VANETs

被引:7
作者
Di Maio, Antonio [1 ]
Palattella, Maria Rita [2 ]
Engel, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, SnT, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[2] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
来源
AD-HOC, MOBILE, AND WIRELESS NETWORKS (ADHOC-NOW 2019) | 2019年 / 11803卷
关键词
Mobile ad-hoc networking; Vehicular networks; Routing; AODV; DSDV; GPSR; Simulation; Performance evaluation; RANDOM WAYPOINT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-31831-4_30
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Infrastructure-less communications between moving vehicles present emblematic challenges because of high node mobility and link volatility, which may harm the performances of different categories of emerging vehicular applications. In order to move data between vehicles that are not in direct communication range, several distributed routing protocols have been proposed and tested in vehicular networks, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Some previous works report disagreeing claims about routing protocol performances in similar vehicular scenarios. Therefore, in this work, we evaluate the performances in terms of Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), packet delay, frame collision rate, and signaling rate of three well-known routing protocols (AODV, DSDV, and GPSR), simulating them in a realistic Manhattan scenario. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of typical urban obstacles (e.g. buildings) on the considered performance metrics. We observed that, in the proposed urban scenario, AODV provided the best PDR, GPSR the best packet delay, and DSDV failed to provide satisfactory performances due to signaling-induced congestion. Simulations showed that considering the shadowing effects induced by the buildings in an urban scenario drastically changes the observed performances, i.e. reduces the frame collisions, decreases the PDR, and increases the packet delay.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 451
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ali AK, 2016, 2016 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (TSP), P60, DOI 10.1109/TSP.2016.7760829
[2]  
Bengag A, 2018, 2018 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (IEEE CIST'18), P525, DOI 10.1109/CIST.2018.8596531
[3]   The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks [J].
Bettstetter, C ;
Resta, G ;
Santi, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2003, 2 (03) :257-269
[4]  
Boukerche Azzedine., 2009, Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks, P129
[5]  
Broch J., 1998, MobiCom'98. Proceedings of Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, P85, DOI 10.1145/288235.288256
[6]  
DiMaio A., 2019, IEEE VTS VEH TECHNOL
[7]   THE SYNCHRONIZATION OF PERIODIC ROUTING MESSAGES [J].
FLOYD, S ;
JACOBSON, V .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 1994, 2 (02) :122-136
[8]   A NEW STATISTICAL APPROACH TO GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION ANALYSIS [J].
GABRIEL, KR ;
SOKAL, RR .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1969, 18 (03) :259-&
[9]  
Johnson DB, 1996, Mob Comput, P153
[10]   Augmenting Self-Driving with Remote Control: Challenges and Directions [J].
Kang, Lei ;
Zhao, Wei ;
Qi, Bozhao ;
Banerjee, Suman .
HOTMOBILE'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MOBILE COMPUTING SYSTEMS & APPLICATIONS, 2018, :19-24