Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test

被引:75
作者
Beckmann, James T. [1 ]
Hung, Man [1 ]
Voss, Maren W. [1 ]
Crum, Anthony B. [1 ]
Bounsanga, Jerry [1 ]
Tyser, Andrew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2016年 / 41卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PROMIS; computerized adaptive testing; upper extremity; physical function; psychometric; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS; HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; PROMIS; SHOULDER; DISABILITIES; ARM; RESPONSIVENESS; PARADIGM; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.025
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper ExtremityComputer Adaptive Test (UE CAT) has recently been made available by the National Institutes of Health to measure physical function outcomes in the upper extremity. We hypothesized that the UE CAT would psychometrically outperform the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (PF CAT) in a hand patient population. Methods The UE CAT, PF CAT, and DASH were each electronically administered to all adult patients who presented to a tertiary hand and upper extremity (nonshoulder) orthopedic clinic. Patient responses were retrospectively studied to determine the validity, reliability, and floor/ceiling effects of all 3 instruments using the Rasch Partial Credit Model. Responder burden and Pearson correlations were calculated for each instrument. Results Atotal of 379 patients completed the UECAT, PFCAT, and the DASH. On average, 6UE CAT, 9 PF CAT, and 30 DASH questions were administered to each patient. All 3 instruments were each highly correlated with each other. Floor effects were low and similar between all instruments; however, ceiling effects were higher in the UE CAT (10.82%) than in the PF CAT (1.32%) or DASH (5.28%). High person reliability (PR) and item reliability (IR) were found for all 3 metrics: UE CAT (a = 0.99; PR = 0.91; IR = 0.94); PF CAT (a = 0.95; PR = 0.89; IR = 0.96); and DASH (a = 0.97; PR = 0.95; IR = 0.99). The UE CAT questions had the best item-fit: only 1 of 15 UE CAT items had poor fit in contrast to 4 of 30 DASH items and 7 of 33 PF CAT items. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the UE CAT compare favorably with the PF CAT and the DASH in nonshoulder upper extremity patients. The relatively large ceiling effect found in the UE CAT could be improved with item bank expansion to include items at the upper end of function. Clinical relevance The UE CAT is a useful patient-reported outcome measure that merits further investigation. Copyright (C) 2016 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:739 / U146
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN
[2]  
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[3]   Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease [J].
Beckmann, James T. ;
Hung, Man ;
Bounsanga, Jerry ;
Wylie, James D. ;
Granger, Erin K. ;
Tashjian, Robert Z. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (12) :1961-1967
[4]  
Bock R.D., 2005, EDUC MEAS-ISSUES PRA, V16, P21, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1997.TB00605.X
[5]   The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years [J].
Cella, David ;
Yount, Susan ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Cook, Karon ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Ader, Deborah ;
Fries, James F. ;
Bruce, Bonnie ;
Rose, Mattias .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) :S3-S11
[6]   Outcomes research in hand surgery: Where have we been and where should we go? [J].
Chung, Kevin C. ;
Burns, Patricia B. ;
Sears, Erika Davis .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 31A (08) :1373-1379
[7]   Measurement of Upper Extremity Disability Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [J].
Doering, Anne-Carolin ;
Nota, Sjoerd P. F. T. ;
Hageman, Michiel G. J. S. ;
Ring, David C. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (06) :1160-1165
[8]   Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release [J].
Gay, RE ;
Amadio, PC ;
Johnson, JC .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 28A (02) :250-254
[9]   The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in intercollegiate athletes: Validity limited by ceiling effect [J].
Hsu, Jason E. ;
Nacke, Elliot ;
Park, Min J. ;
Sennett, Brian J. ;
Huffman, G. Russell .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (03) :349-354
[10]  
Hudak PL, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P602, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO