A large CVaR-based portfolio selection model with weight constraints

被引:29
作者
Xu, Qifa [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yingying [1 ]
Jiang, Cuixia [1 ]
Yu, Keming [3 ]
Niu, Xufeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Proc Optimizat & Intelligent Decis Making, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Brunel Univ, Dept Math, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[4] Florida State Univ, Dept Stat, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA
关键词
Finance; CVaR-based portfolio; Risk assessment; Weight constraints; Quantile regression; VARIABLE SELECTION; QUANTILE REGRESSION; CONDITIONAL VALUE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2016.08.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although the traditional CVaR-based portfolio methods are successfully used in practice, the size of a portfolio with thousands of assets makes optimizing them difficult, if not impossible to solve. In this article we introduce a large CVaR-based portfolio selection method by imposing weight constraints on the standard CVaR-based portfolio selection model, which effectively avoids extreme positions often emerging in traditional methods. We propose to solve the large CVaR-based portfolio model with weight constraints using penalized quantile regression techniques, which overcomes the difficulties of large scale optimization in traditional methods. We illustrate the method via empirical analysis of optimal portfolios on Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 (HS300) index and Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite (SSEC) index of China. The empirical results show that our method is efficient to solve a large portfolio selection and performs well in dispersing tail risk of a portfolio by only using a small amount of financial assets. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 447
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Economic implications of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection: A comparison with mean-variance analysis [J].
Alexander, GJ ;
Baptista, AM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2002, 26 (7-8) :1159-1193
[2]  
Bassett G.W., 2004, J FINANCIAL ECONOMET, V2, P477, DOI [10.1093/jjfinec/nbh023, DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBH023]
[3]   Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios [J].
Brodie, Joshua ;
Daubechies, Ingrid ;
De Mol, Christine ;
Giannone, Domenico ;
Loris, Ignace .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (30) :12267-12272
[4]   Backtesting VaR in consideration of the higher moments of the distribution for minimum-variance hedging portfolios [J].
Chuang, Chung-Chu ;
Wang, Yi-Hsien ;
Yeh, Tsai-Jung ;
Chuang, Shuo-Li .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 42 :15-19
[5]   Tail estimation and mean-VaR portfolio selection in markets subject to financial instability [J].
Consigli, G .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (07) :1355-1382
[6]   COMMON RISK-FACTORS IN THE RETURNS ON STOCKS AND BONDS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
FRENCH, KR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 33 (01) :3-56
[7]   Vast Portfolio Selection With Gross-Exposure Constraints [J].
Fan, Jianqing ;
Zhang, Jingjin ;
Yu, Ke .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 107 (498) :592-606
[8]   Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties [J].
Fan, JQ ;
Li, RZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (456) :1348-1360
[9]   Constructing optimal sparse portfolios using regularization methods [J].
Fastrich B. ;
Paterlini S. ;
Winker P. .
Computational Management Science, 2015, 12 (3) :417-434
[10]   Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps [J].
Jagannathan, R ;
Ma, TS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (04) :1651-1683