Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis

被引:215
作者
Bennett, Nathan J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Satterfield, Terre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Inst Oceans & Fisheries, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Ocean Solut, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
conservation; effective governance; environmental governance; environmental management; equitable governance; responsive governance; robust governance; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORKS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; COLLABORATION; RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12600
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Governance is one of the most important factors for ensuring effective environmental management and conservation actions. Yet, there is still a relative paucity of comprehensive and practicable guidance that can be used to frame the evaluation, design, and analysis of systems of environmental governance. This conceptual review and synthesis article seeks to addresses this problem through resituating the broad body of governance literature into a practical framework for environmental governance. Our framework builds on a rich history of governance scholarship to propose that environmental governance has four general aims or objectives - to be effective, to be equitable, to be responsive, and to be robust. Each of these four objectives need to be considered simultaneously across the institutional, structural, and procedural elements of environmental governance. Through a review of the literature, we developed a set of attributes for each of these objectives and relate these to the overall capacity, functioning, and performance of environmental governance. Our aim is to provide a practical and adaptable framework that can be applied to the design, evaluation, and analysis of environmental governance in different social and political contexts, to diverse environmental problems and modes of governance, and at a range of scales.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[61]   Is Adaptive Co-management Delivering? Examining Relationships Between Collaboration, Learning and Outcomes in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves [J].
Plummer, Ryan ;
Baird, Julia ;
Dzyundzyak, Angela ;
Armitage, Derek ;
Bodin, Orjan ;
Schultz, Lisen .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 140 :79-88
[62]   Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review [J].
Reed, Mark S. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (10) :2417-2431
[63]   Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: A set of indicators [J].
Secco, Laura ;
Da Re, Riccardo ;
Pettenella, Davide Matteo ;
Gatto, Paola .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 49 :57-71
[64]   Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach [J].
Tengo, Maria ;
Brondizio, Eduardo S. ;
Elmqvist, Thomas ;
Malmer, Pernilla ;
Spierenburg, Marja .
AMBIO, 2014, 43 (05) :579-591
[65]  
Termeer CJAM, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
[66]  
Tschakert P, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
[67]   Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance [J].
Turner, Rachel A. ;
Addison, Jane ;
Arias, Adrian ;
Bergseth, Brock J. ;
Marshall, Nadine A. ;
Morrison, Tiffany H. ;
Tobin, Renae C. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (03)
[68]   Adaptive Comanagement of a Marine Protected Area Network in Fiji [J].
Weeks, Rebecca ;
Jupiter, Stacy D. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (06) :1234-1244
[70]   Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: adaptive governance and connectivity conservation [J].
Wyborn, Carina A. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01)