Fundamentals of manipulator stiffness modeling using matrix structural analysis

被引:85
作者
Klimchik, Alexandr [1 ]
Pashkevich, Anatol [2 ,3 ]
Chablat, Damien [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innopolis Univ, Univ Skaya St 1, Innopolis 420500, Tatarstan, Russia
[2] IMT Atlantique, 4 Rue Alfred Kastler, F-44307 Nantes, France
[3] CNRS, Lab Sci Numer Nantes LS2N, UMR 6004, 1 Rue Noe, F-44321 Nantes, France
[4] CNRS, Paris, France
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Manipulator stiffness modeling; Matrix structural analysis; Cartesian stiffness matrix; Hybrid architectures; Passive joints; PARALLEL MANIPULATORS; IDENTIFICATION; MECHANISMS; SERIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.11.023
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The paper generalizes existing contributions to the stiffness modeling of robotic manipulators using Matrix Structural Analysis. It presents a unified and systematic approach that is suitable for serial, parallel and hybrid architectures containing closed-loops, flexible links, and rigid connections, passive and elastic joints, flexible and rigid platforms, taking into account external loadings and preloadings. The proposed approach can be applied to both under-constrained, fully-constrained and over-constrained manipulators in generic and singular configurations, it is able to produce either non-singular or rank-deficient Cartesian stiffness matrices in a semi-analytical manner. It is based on a unified mathematical formulation that presents the manipulator stiffness model as a set of two groups of matrix equations describing elasticity of separate links and connections between the links in the form of constraints. Its principal advantage is the simplicity of the model generation that includes straightforward aggregation of link/joint equations without conventional merging of rows and columns in the global stiffness matrix. The advantages of this method and its application are illustrated by an example that deals with the stiffness analysis of NaVaRo parallel manipulator where the efficiency of the proposed technique was confirmed by the FEA modeling. For this example, the computational expenses for stiffness modeling were estimated on the level of 10 ms per a manipulator configuration (in Matlab environment on the conventional laptop). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 394
页数:30
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Model-Based Stability Prediction of a Machining Robot [J].
Mousavi, S. ;
Gagnol, V. ;
Bouzgarrou, B. C. ;
Ray, P. .
NEW ADVANCES IN MECHANISMS, MECHANICAL TRANSMISSIONS AND ROBOTICS, 2017, 46 :379-387
[22]  
Nagai K, 2008, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P1543
[23]   Enhanced stiffness modeling of manipulators with passive joints [J].
Pashkevich, Anatol ;
Klimchik, Alexandr ;
Chablat, Damien .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2011, 46 (05) :662-679
[24]   Stiffness analysis of overconstrained parallel manipulators [J].
Pashkevich, Anatol ;
Chablat, Damien ;
Wenger, Philippe .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2009, 44 (05) :966-982
[25]   A methodology for static stiffness mapping in lower mobility parallel manipulators with decoupled motions [J].
Pinto, Charles ;
Corral, Javier ;
Altuzarra, Oscar ;
Hernandez, Alfonso .
ROBOTICA, 2010, 28 :719-735
[26]  
Przemieniecki Janusz S., 1985, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis
[27]  
Quennouelle C., 2008, ASME 2008 INT DES EN, P163
[28]   On the stiffness analysis of robotic manipulators and calculation of stiffness indices [J].
Raoofian, Ali ;
Taghvaeipour, Afshin ;
Kamali, Ali E. .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2018, 130 :382-402
[29]  
Salisbury J. K., 1980, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, P95
[30]  
Shi S., 2017, FUSION ENG DES