Comparative Effect of Telmisartan vs Lisinopril on Blood Pressure in Patients of Metabolic Syndrome

被引:5
作者
Gore, Pradip N. [1 ]
Badar, Vandana A. [1 ]
Hardas, Mrunalini M. [2 ]
Bansode, Varsha J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Govt Med Coll IGGMC & Hosp, Dept Pharmacol, Nagpur 440018, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Govt Med Coll IGGMC & Hosp, Dept Med, Nagpur 440018, Maharashtra, India
[3] AISSMS Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacol, Pune 411001, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Blood pressure; lisinopril; metabolic syndrome; telmisartan; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; INSULIN-RESISTANCE SYNDROME; ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-GAMMA; MECHANISMS; COUGH; HYPERTENSION; ANTAGONISTS; PREVALENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2174/1871530314666141128154152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The present study was planned to focus on comparative effects of telmisartan vs lisinopril on blood pressure in patients of metabolic syndrome Methods: The study was carried out on 62 patients of metabolic syndrome from Dec 2010 to Oct 2012 in OPD of Institute. There were two groups, A and B. Group A-Telmisartan (31 patients) and Group B-Lisinopril (31 patients) receiving Telmisartan 40 mg and lisinopril 5 mg orally once a day respectively for 12 weeks. The diagnosis of essential hypertension was made by the physician based on two measurements of blood pressure on two different occasions using auscultatory method and was done at initial stage and repeated after 6 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment in Group A and Group B patients. Key findings: Our study found that telmisartan or lisinopril treatment for 12 weeks leads to statistically significant (p<0.001) reduction in both SBP and DBP at 6 and 12 weeks when compared with baseline, whereas comparison between telmisartan and lisinopril treatment failed to show any statistically significant effect. Conclusion: Treatment of metabolic patients with telmisartan or lisinopril for the management of hypertension reduced both Systolic blood pressure (SBP) as well as Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) statistically significantly during 12 weeks treatment. However, telmisartan and lisinopril treatment were found effective.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Identification of telmisartan as a unique angiotensin II receptor antagonist with selective PPARγ-modulating activity
    Benson, SC
    Pershadsingh, HA
    Ho, CI
    Chittiboyina, A
    Desai, P
    Pravenec, M
    Qi, NN
    Wang, JM
    Avery, MA
    Kurtz, TW
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2004, 43 (05) : 993 - 1002
  • [2] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [3] Dandan R.H., 2011, RENIN ANGIOTENSIN GO, P721
  • [4] de Gasparo M, 2004, HANDB EXP PHARM, V163/2, P417
  • [5] Deepa R, 2002, INDIAN J MED RES, V115, P118
  • [6] Eckle R.H., 2012, METABOLIC SYNDROME H, P1992
  • [7] Flakoll P., 2004, DIABETES MELLITUS FU, V3rd, P165
  • [8] Effect of bradykinin-receptor blockade on the response to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in normotensive and hypertensive subjects
    Gainer, JV
    Morrow, JD
    Loveland, A
    King, DJ
    Brown, NJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (18) : 1285 - 1292
  • [9] Grundy S., 2004, MEDSCAPE CARDIOL, V8
  • [10] Prevalence of diabetes impaired fasting glucose and insulin resistance syndrome in an urban Indian population
    Gupta, A
    Gupta, R
    Sarna, M
    Rastogi, S
    Gupta, VP
    Kothari, K
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 61 (01) : 69 - 76