A comparison of torque required to fracture rotary files with tips bound in simulated curved canal

被引:24
作者
Guiford, WL
Lemons, JE
Eleazer, PD
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Biomat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.don.0000148867.30520.9e
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare torque force and rotation needed to fracture three types of nickel titanium alloy rotary instruments in a simulated curved root canal space that were bound at the file tip. Files of similar size tips were studied. The files studied were ProFiles with 0.04 taper diameters of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45; 0.04 ProFile GT sizes 20, 30, 40; and ProTaper files sizes S1, S2, F1, F2, and F3. All files were 25 mm in length. Unwinding was defined as the rotation in degrees it took for a file to fracture after the first evidence of permanent deformation. All files exhibited permanent deformation before breaking, with the ProFile GT files demonstrating the greatest unwinding. The #45 0.04 ProFile withstood the most force while the #20 ProFile GT required the least amount of force before beginning to exhibit permanent deformation. The S1 and S2 ProTaper files fractured with so little rotation that no extended data were recorded. Generally, as the file diameter increased, the force needed to begin unwinding also increased. Also, as the file diameter increased, the force needed to fracture also increased.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 470
页数:3
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: Conventional filing versus Profile .04 Taper Series 29 [J].
Beeson, TJ ;
Hartwell, GR ;
Thornton, JD ;
Gunsolley, JC .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1998, 24 (01) :18-22
[2]   Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile [J].
Berutti, E ;
Chiandussi, G ;
Gaviglio, I ;
Ibba, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (01) :15-19
[3]   A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip [J].
Booth, JR ;
Scheetz, JP ;
Lemons, JE ;
Eleazer, PD .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (01) :55-57
[4]   Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces [J].
Bortnick, KL ;
Steiman, HR ;
Ruskin, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (01) :57-59
[5]   Differential scanning calorimetric studies of nickel titanium rotary endodontic instruments [J].
Brantley, WA ;
Svec, TA ;
Iijima, M ;
Powers, JM ;
Grentzer, TH .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (08) :567-572
[6]   Differential scanning calorimetric studies of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments after simulated clinical use [J].
Brantley, WA ;
Svec, TA ;
Iijima, M ;
Powers, JM ;
Grentzer, TH .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (11) :774-778
[7]   Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm [J].
Daugherty, DW ;
Gound, TG ;
Comer, TL .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (02) :93-95
[8]  
de Melo MCC, 2002, J ENDODONT, V28, P765
[9]   Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low- and high-torque endodontic motors [J].
Gambarini, G .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (12) :772-774
[10]   Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments [J].
Haïkel, Y ;
Serfaty, R ;
Bateman, G ;
Senger, B ;
Allemann, C .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (06) :434-440