The Two Faces of Diversity: The Relationships between Religious Polarization, Religious Fractionalization, and Self-rated Health

被引:12
作者
Lu, Yun [1 ]
Yang, Xiaozhao Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Work, Bldg 344, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
democracy; fractionalization; polarization; religious diversity; self-rated health; NATIONAL CONTEXT; MORTALITY; CONFLICT; STRESS; ASSOCIATION; AFFILIATION; PERCEPTIONS; COMPETITION; DEPRESSION; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1177/0022146520904373
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A dominant discourse in the social sciences theorizes that religious diversity puts individuals' health at risk via interreligious hostility. However, this discourse overlooks the different subtypes of religious diversity and the moderation of political institutions. To better understand the issue of diversity and health, in this study, we distinguish between two subtypes of religious diversity-polarization and fractionalization-and argue that their impacts on health are heterogeneous. Using a sample of 67,399 individuals from 51 societies drawn from the 2010-2014 wave of the World Values Survey, our multilevel analyses show that religious polarization is negatively associated with individual health, whereas the health effects of religious fractionalization are positive. Moreover, the associations between religious polarization/fractionalization and individual health are found to depend on the democratic level of the state. In more democratic countries, the negative effects of polarization on health are mitigated, and the positive effects of fractionalization are stronger.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 95
页数:17
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion
    Ammerman, Nancy T.
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2013, 52 (02) : 258 - 278
  • [2] SOCIAL STRESS - THEORY AND RESEARCH
    ANESHENSEL, CS
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1992, 18 : 15 - 38
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Europe's Growing Muslim Population
  • [4] [Anonymous], LETT ENGLAND
  • [5] How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
    Barnish, Max
    Tornes, Michelle
    Nelson-Horne, Becky
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [6] Bays DanielH., 2011, NEW HIST CHRISTIANIT
  • [7] Berger PL, 2014, MANY ALTARS OF MODERNITY: TOWARD A PARADIGM FOR RELIGION IN A PLURALIST AGE, P1, DOI 10.1515/9781614516477
  • [8] Universal Happiness? Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of Scales Assessing Positive Mental Health
    Bieda, Angela
    Hirschfeld, Gerrit
    Schoenfeld, Pia
    Brailovskaia, Julia
    Zhang, Xiao Chi
    Margraf, Juergen
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 29 (04) : 408 - 421
  • [9] Faith, morality and mortality: The ecological impact of religion on population health
    Blanchard, Troy C.
    Bartkowski, John P.
    Matthews, Todd L.
    Kerley, Kent R.
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 2008, 86 (04) : 1591 - 1620
  • [10] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS - PARAMETERS OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE
    BLAU, PM
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 39 (05) : 615 - 635