Effects of a blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids with and without Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs

被引:11
作者
Lei, Xin Jian [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sang In [2 ]
Lee, Kwang Yong [2 ]
Dinh Hai Nguyen [2 ]
Kim, In Ho [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Dankook Univ, Dept Anim Resource & Sci, Cheonan 31116, Chungnam, South Korea
关键词
Enterococcus faecium; pigs; growth performance; nutrient digestibility; organic acids; NOXIOUS GAS EMISSION; DIETARY COMBINATIONS; MICROBIAL ECOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; DIFFERENT ENERGY; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; DENSITY DIETS; DSM; 7134; SUPPLEMENTATION; PROBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1139/cjas-2017-0126
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted to assess effects of Enterococcus faecium and a blend of organic acids (OAs) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) in finishing pigs. A total of 120 pigs [Duroc x (Yorkshire x Landrace); 51.04 +/- 1.82 kg] were randomly assigned to five dietary treatments: CON, basal diet; BOM1, CON + 500 mg kg(-1) blend of OAs and MCFAs; BOM2, CON + 1000 mg kg(-1) blend of OAs and MCFAs; EBOM1, BOM1 + 20 mg kg(-1) E. faecium; EBOM2, BOM2 + 20 mg kg(-1) E. faecium. Pigs fed EBOM1 and EBOM2 diets had higher average daily gain and average daily feed intake (during days 36-70 and days 1-70) and greater digestibility of dry matter (days 35 and 70) compared with those fed BOM1 and BOM2 diets (P < 0.05). However, no differences on blood parameters and meat quality were observed between pigs offered BOM1 and BOM2 diets and those fed EBOM1 and EBOM2 diets (P > 0.05). In conclusion, supplementation with the combination of E. faecium and a blend of OAs and MCFAs was more effective in improving growth performance and nutrient digestibility than supplementation with blend of OAs and MCFAs alone in finishing pigs.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 859
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NUTR REQ SWIN, V11th
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Association of official analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis
[3]   Antimicrobial growth promoter use in livestock: a requirement to understand their modes of action to develop effective alternatives [J].
Brown, Kirsty ;
Uwiera, Richard R. E. ;
Kalmokoff, Martin L. ;
Brooks, Steve P. J. ;
Inglis, G. Douglas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2017, 49 (01) :12-24
[4]  
Canibe N, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P2019
[5]   The European ban on growth-promoting antibiotics and emerging consequences for human and animal health [J].
Casewell, M ;
Friis, C ;
Marco, E ;
McMullin, P ;
Phillips, I .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 52 (02) :159-161
[6]  
Cernauskiene J, 2011, VET ZOOTECH-LITH, V54, P20
[7]   Probiotics in animal nutrition and health [J].
Chaucheyras-Durand, F. ;
Durand, H. .
BENEFICIAL MICROBES, 2010, 1 (01) :3-9
[8]   Effects of dietary Enterococcus faecium SF68 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in finishing pigs [J].
Chen, YJ ;
Min, BJ ;
Cho, JH ;
Kwon, OS ;
Son, KS ;
Kim, IH ;
Kim, SJ .
ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2006, 19 (03) :406-411
[9]   Strategic use of feed ingredients and feed additives to stimulate gut health and development in young pigs [J].
de Lange, C. F. M. ;
Pluske, J. ;
Gong, J. ;
Nyachoti, C. M. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 134 (1-3) :124-134
[10]   Effect of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) supplementation on the growth performance, digestibility and blood profiles in weanling pigs [J].
Devi, S. Mohana ;
Kim, I. H. .
VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2014, 59 (11) :527-535