Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values

被引:15
作者
Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo [1 ,2 ]
Orlando, Alessia Angela Maria [1 ]
Dimarco, Mariangela [2 ]
Zarcaro, Calogero [1 ]
Ferraro, Fabiola [1 ]
Cirino, Alessandra [1 ]
Matranga, Domenica [3 ]
Vieni, Salvatore [4 ]
Cabibi, Daniela [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Policlin P Giaccone, Dept Biomed Neurosci & Adv Diagnost BiND, Via Vespro 129, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
[2] Fdn Ist G Giglio, Cefalu, PA, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Policlin P Giaccone, Dept Hlth Promot & Mother & Child Care Internal M, Palermo, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Policlin P Giaccone, Dept Surg Oncol & Oral Sci, Div Gen & Oncol Surg, Palermo, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp Policlin P Giaccone, Dept Hlth Promot Mother & Child Care Internal Med, Anat Pathol Unit, Palermo, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2022年 / 127卷 / 11期
关键词
Breast; Ultrasonography; Elasticity imaging techniques; Shear wave imaging; ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; EFSUMB GUIDELINES; SHEAR; LESIONS; RECOMMENDATIONS; BENIGN; STRAIN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-022-01546-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To assess the role of 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in differentiating benign from malignant focal breast lesions (FBLs), providing new vendor-specific cutoff values. Methods 158 FBLs (size: 3.5-50 mm) detected in 151 women (age: 21-87 years) were prospectively evaluated by means 2D-SWE. For each lesion, an expert radiologist assessed US BI-RADS category and calculated the following four 2D-SWE parameters: (1) elasticity maximum (E-max); (2) mean elasticity (E-mean); (3) minimum elasticity (E-min); (4) elasticity ratio (E-ratio). US-guided core-biopsy was considered as standard of reference for all the FBLs classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5. For each 2D-SWE parameter, the optimal cutoff value for a diagnostic test was calculated using the Youden method. Diagnostic performance of the US BI-RADS and 2D-SWE parameters was calculated accordingly. Results 83/158 (52.5%) FBLs were benign and 75/158 (47.5%) were malignant. Statistically significant higher stiffness values were observed in malignant FBLs for all 2D-SWE parameters than in benign ones (p < 0.001). 2D-SWE cutoff values were 82.6 kPa, 66.0 kPa and 53.6 kPa, respectively, for E-max, E-mean, E-min and 330.8% for E-ratio. The 2D-SWE parameter showing the best diagnostic accuracy was E-max (85.44%). Considering US BI-RADS 3 (n = 60) and 4a (n = 32) FBLs, E-max and E-mean showed the best diagnostic accuracy (85.87% for both), without a statistically significant decrease in sensitivity (p = 0.7003 and p = 1, respectively). Conclusion Our study provides new vendor-specific cutoff values for 2D-SWE, suggesting its possible clinical use in the adjunctive assessment of category US-BI-RADS 3 and 4a breast masses.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1220
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Abdelwahab K, 2017, J SURG CASE REP, DOI 10.1093/jscr/rjx248
  • [2] A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions
    Altintas, Yasemin
    Bayrak, Mehmet
    Alabaz, Omer
    Celiktas, Medih
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (09) : 1155 - 1162
  • [3] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20): : 2191 - 2194
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BRE
  • [5] Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Solid Breast Masses: Determination of the Most Discriminatory Parameter
    Au, Frederick Wing-Fa
    Ghai, Sandeep
    Moshonov, Hadas
    Kahn, Harriette
    Brennan, Cressida
    Dua, Hemi
    Crystal, Pavel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (03) : W328 - W336
  • [6] Breast elasticity: Principles, technique, results: An update and overview of commercially available software
    Balleyguier, C.
    Canale, S.
    Ben Hassen, W.
    Vielh, P.
    Bayou, E. H.
    Mathieu, M. C.
    Uzan, C.
    Bourgier, C.
    Dromain, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (03) : 427 - 434
  • [7] EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology
    Bamber, J.
    Cosgrove, D.
    Dietrich, C. F.
    Fromageau, J.
    Bojunga, J.
    Calliada, F.
    Cantisani, V.
    Correas, J. -M.
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Drakonaki, E. E.
    Fink, M.
    Friedrich-Rust, M.
    Gilja, O. H.
    Havre, R. F.
    Jenssen, C.
    Klauser, A. S.
    Ohlinger, R.
    Saftoiu, A.
    Schaefer, F.
    Sporea, I.
    Piscaglia, F.
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 34 (02): : 169 - 184
  • [8] WFUMB GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL USE OF ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY: PART 2: BREAST
    Barr, Richard G.
    Nakashima, Kazutaka
    Amy, Dominique
    Cosgrove, David
    Farrokh, Andre
    Schafer, Fritz
    Bamber, Jeffrey C.
    Castera, Laurent
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    Chou, Yi-Hong
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Ding, Hong
    Ferraioli, Giovanna
    Filice, Carlo
    Friedrich-Rust, Mireen
    Hall, Timothy J.
    Nightingale, Kathryn R.
    Palmeri, Mark L.
    Shiina, Tsuyoshi
    Suzuki, Shinichi
    Sporea, Ioan
    Wilson, Stephanie
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (05) : 1148 - 1160
  • [9] Future of breast elastography
    Barr, Richard Gary
    [J]. ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2019, 38 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [10] Bartolotta TV, 2011, RADIOL MED, V116, P1027, DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0648-y