Informational efficiency and behaviour within in-play prediction markets

被引:17
作者
Angelini, Giovanni [1 ,3 ]
De Angelis, Luca [1 ,3 ]
Singleton, Carl [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Econ, Whiteknights Campus, Reading RG6 6EL, Berks, England
[3] Dipartimento Sci Econ, Piazza Scaravilli 2, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Market efficiency; Favourite-longshot bias; Mispricing; Behavioural bias; Betting strategy; FAVORITE-LONGSHOT BIAS; PARIMUTUEL BETTING MARKETS; GAMBLING MARKETS; PRICE REACTION; AGGREGATION; UNDERREACTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; ARBITRAGE; SPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.05.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Studies of financial market informational efficiency have proven burdensome in practice, because it is difficult to pinpoint when news breaks and is known by some or all the participants. We overcome this by designing a framework to detect mispricing, test informational efficiency and evaluate the behavioural biases within high-frequency prediction markets. We demonstrate this using betting exchange data for association football, exploiting the moment when the first goal is scored in a match as major news that breaks cleanly. There are pre-match and in-play mispricing and inefficiency in these markets, explained by reverse favourite-longshot bias (favourite bias). The mispricing tends to increase when the major news is a surprise, such as a goal scored by a longshot team late in a match, with the market underestimating their chances of going on to win These results suggest that, even in prediction markets with large crowds of participants trading state-contingent claims, significant informational inefficiency and behavioural biases can be reflected in prices. (c) 2021 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 299
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   PROBABILITY AND UTILITY ESTIMATES FOR RACETRACK BETTORS [J].
ALI, MM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1977, 85 (04) :803-815
[2]   Efficiency of online football betting markets [J].
Angelini, Giovanni ;
De Angelis, Luca .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2019, 35 (02) :712-721
[3]   How the equity market responds to unanticipated events [J].
Brooks, RM ;
Patel, A ;
Su, T .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2003, 76 (01) :109-133
[4]   Information Acquisition in Ostensibly Efficient Markets [J].
Brown, Alasdair .
ECONOMICA, 2015, 82 (327) :420-447
[5]   INFORMATION PROCESSING CONSTRAINTS AND ASSET MISPRICING [J].
Brown, Alasdair .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2014, 124 (575) :245-268
[6]   An Examination of the Determinants of Biased Behaviour in a Market for State Contingent Claims [J].
Bruce, Alistair C. ;
Johnson, Johnnie E. V. ;
Peirson, John D. ;
Yu, Jiejun .
ECONOMICA, 2009, 76 (302) :282-303
[7]   The favourite-longshot bias and market efficiency in UK football betting [J].
Cain, M ;
Law, D ;
Peel, D .
SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 47 (01) :25-36
[8]   Stock price reaction to news and no-news: drift and reversal after headlines [J].
Chan, WS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 70 (02) :223-260
[9]   The role of surprise: Understanding overreaction and underreaction to unanticipated events using in-play soccer betting market [J].
Choi, Darwin ;
Hui, Sam K. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2014, 107 :614-629
[10]   Corporate Prediction Markets: Evidence from Google, Ford, and Firm X [J].
Cowgill, Bo ;
Zitzewitz, Eric .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2015, 82 (04) :1309-1341