Metadiscourse, Cohesion, and Engagement in L2 Written Discourse

被引:6
作者
Liao, Jianling [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Int Letters & Cultures, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
L2; Chinese; descriptive writing; metadiscourse; cohesion; local; global; text; interactive; interactional; LINGUISTIC ACCURACY; COHERENCE; FEATURES; ENGLISH; TEXT; L1;
D O I
10.3390/languages5020025
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The current study examines how L2 Chinese writers at different proficiencies employed various metadiscourse devices to shape their written descriptive discourse and also whether various metadiscourse features may distinguish levels of writing proficiency. The study also looks at how L2 learners' use of metadiscourse devices is related to their linguistic performances in descriptive writing. The findings revealed differential metadiscourse use by learners at different proficiencies on local, global, and textual organizational dimensions. For instance, compared to low-proficiency writers, more proficient writers used significantly more conditional/hypothetical markers, frame markers, and engagement markers. Multiple metadiscourse features also demonstrated significant positive and negative correlations with each other, suggesting patterns of decreases and increases in the use of particular organizational features. Several metadiscourse features characteristic of more advanced writers also displayed positive relationships with linguistic features.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TOOL AUTOMATIC ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012
[3]  
Bardovi-Harlig K., 1990, COHERENCE WRITING, P41
[4]   Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1 [J].
Chen, Yu-Hua ;
Baker, Paul .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2016, 37 (06) :849-880
[5]  
Chiang S., 2003, System, V31, P471, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2003.02.002, 10.1016/j.system.2003.02.002]
[6]  
CONNOR U, 1990, RES TEACH ENGL, V24, P67
[7]   The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
Kyle, Kristopher ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 48 (04) :1227-1237
[8]   The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
Kyle, Kristopher ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2016, 32 :1-16
[9]   Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2012, 35 (02) :115-135
[10]  
Crossley SA, 2011, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V6738, P438, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_62