Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review

被引:22
作者
Huang, Allan B. [1 ]
Wu, Jenny [2 ]
Chen, Ling [1 ]
Albright, Benjamin B. [2 ]
Previs, Rebecca A. [2 ]
Moss, Haley A. [2 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [2 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [2 ]
Melamed, Alexander [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wright, Jason D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
来源
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS | 2021年 / 38卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Uterine cancer; Hysterectomy; Neoadjuvant; Cytoreduction; Debulking; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; CLINICAL-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; PERITONEAL CANCERS; III/IV OVARIAN; IV; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL; STRATEGIES; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2021.100887
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: While primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is considered the standard of care for women who present with stage IV endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy. We summarized the literature and compared outcomes of PCS compared to NACT and ICS. Methods: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2020. Key search terms included multiple descriptors of advanced disease status in combination with "endometrial cancer" and "neoadjuvant chemotherapy". Our review included studies that examined survival and surgical outcomes of patients with stage III or IV endometrial cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus those who received primary cytoreductive surgery. We excluded studies examining only patients with leiomyosarcomas, carcinosarcomas, and stromal sarcomas due to the biologic heterogeneity of these malignancies. Results: The nine included studies encompassed 5,844 patients, of which 1,317 (22.5%) received NACT and 4,527 received PCS (77.5%). With the exception of a single study, all were retrospective observational studies or case series. Use of NACT in patients with stage IV EC increased from 16.0% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2015. Five studies analyzed median overall survival and all but one reported no significant difference between NACT + ICS vs. PCS. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm of residual disease) rates were similar across both treatment groups in three separate analyses, however pooled data suggest improved rates of optimal cytoreduction for NACT + ICS vs. PCS patients (81.9% vs. 51.5% respectively). Patients receiving NACT experienced significantly shorter hospital admissions and lower operative times compared to PCS counterparts. Conclusions: NACT followed by ICS reduces perioperative morbidity while offering similar overall survival.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
[22]   Phase III trial of upfront debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602 [J].
Onda, Takashi ;
Matsumoto, Koji ;
Shibata, Taro ;
Sato, Akihiro ;
Fukuda, Haruhiko ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Kamura, Toshiharu ;
Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 38 (01) :74-77
[23]   Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602 [J].
Onda, Takashi ;
Satoh, Toyomi ;
Saito, Toshiaki ;
Kasamatsu, Takahiro ;
Nakanishi, Toru ;
Nakamura, Kenichi ;
Wakabayashi, Masashi ;
Takehara, Kazuhiro ;
Saito, Motoaki ;
Ushijima, Kimio ;
Kobayashi, Hiroaki ;
Kawana, Kei ;
Yokota, Harushige ;
Takano, Masashi ;
Takeshima, Nobuhiro ;
Watanabe, Yoh ;
Yaegashi, Nobuo ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Kamura, Toshiharu ;
Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 64 :22-31
[24]   The clinical management of inoperable endometrial carcinoma [J].
Palisoul, Marguerite ;
Mutch, David G. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (05) :515-521
[25]   Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial carcinoma: a glimmer of hope in select patients [J].
Rabinovich, Alex .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) :47-53
[26]   Advanced stage (IIIC/IV) endometrial cancer: Role of cytoreduction and determinants of survival [J].
Rajkumar, Savithri ;
Nath, Rahul ;
Lan, Geoffrey ;
Mehra, Gautam ;
Begum, Shahina ;
Sayasneh, Ahmad .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 234 :26-31
[27]   Surgical cytoreduction in stage IV endometrioid endometrial carcinoma [J].
Shih, K. K. ;
Yon, E. ;
Gardner, G. J. ;
Barakat, R. R. ;
Chi, D. S. ;
Leitao, M. M., Jr. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (03) :608-611
[28]  
Siegel RL, 2017, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V67, P7, DOI [10.3322/caac.21387, 10.3322/caac.21669]
[29]   Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival in Women With Metastatic Endometrial Cancer [J].
Tobias, Claire J. ;
Chen, Ling ;
Melamed, Alexander ;
St Clair, Caryn ;
Khoury-Collado, Fady ;
Tergas, Ana I. ;
Hou, June Y. ;
Hur, Chin ;
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Neugut, Alfred I. ;
Hershman, Dawn L. ;
Wright, Jason D. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (12)
[30]   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment? [J].
Vandenput, I. ;
Van Calster, B. ;
Capoen, A. ;
Leunen, K. ;
Berteloot, P. ;
Neven, P. ;
Moerman, Ph ;
Vergote, I. ;
Amant, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (02) :244-249