Tolerance analysis and evaluation of uncertain automatic battery replacement system

被引:22
作者
Geng, Shuanglong [1 ]
Liu, Xintian [1 ]
Liang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Wang, Xiaolan [1 ]
Wang, Yansong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Mech & Automot Engn, 333 Long Teng Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Universal grey number theory; Tolerance and error; Uncertainty analysis; Automatic battery replacement system; Error analysis; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; ROBUST DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; INTERVAL; PROBABILITY; MECHANISMS; PARAMETERS; ALLOCATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-019-02356-x
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Considering manufacturing errors and installation errors in the automatic battery replacement system, it is necessary to analyze the uncertainty of the automatic battery replacement system to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the system. There are a few universal approaches for uncertainty analysis, such as interval analysis, probability analysis, and combination approach. This paper uses grey number theory, a relatively new method, to analyze. The analysis on the coordinates of the support points finds that the grey number theory can output a range smaller than that of the other three methods, and its results are in line with the actual situation. The grey number theory is used to analyze the coordinate position change of the support point of the automatic battery replacement device with the input error change and the driving rod angle change. The bar tolerance and error circle (installation error) existing in the system are also taken into consideration. Comparing the results produced by the case where error circle is considered and that is not, it can be seen that the influence of the error circle on the results is relatively insignificant compared with that of rod tolerance, but the influence cannot be ignored for structures requiring high precision. Therefore, the analysis of the input error percentage can yield a reasonable control range of the input error based on the grey number theory, which not only ensures the system is safe and reliable, but also is cost-efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Robust designs for misspecified logistic models [J].
Adewale, Adeniyi J. ;
Wiens, Douglas P. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2009, 139 (01) :3-15
[2]   On the algebraic solution of fuzzy linear systems based on interval theory [J].
Allahviranloo, T. ;
Ghanbari, M. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (11) :5360-5379
[3]   Electricity consumption forecasting for Turkey with nonhomogeneous discrete grey model [J].
Ayvaz, Berk ;
Kusakci, Ali Osman .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2017, 12 (03) :260-267
[4]  
Cai QX, 2016, J GREY SYST-UK, V28, P173
[5]   Uncertainty quantification of multi-dimensional parameters for composite laminates based on grey mathematical theory [J].
Chen, Xiao ;
Wang, Xiaojun ;
Wang, Lei ;
Shi, Qinghe ;
Li, Yunlong .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 55 :299-313
[6]   A disc to air heat flux error and uncertainty analysis applied to a turbomachinery test rig design [J].
Cooke, A. ;
Childs, P. ;
Sayma, N. ;
Long, C. A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2009, 223 (03) :659-674
[7]   Uncertainty analysis of effective elasticity tensors using quaternion-based global optimization and Monte-Carlo method [J].
Danek, T. ;
Kochetov, M. ;
Slawinski, M. A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF MECHANICS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2013, 66 (02) :253-272
[8]   CONTROL-PROBLEMS OF GREY SYSTEMS [J].
DENG, JL .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1982, 1 (05) :288-294
[9]   Uncertainty analysis for structures with hybrid random and interval parameters using mathematical programming approach [J].
Feng, Jinwen ;
Wu, Di ;
Gao, Wei ;
Li, Guoyin .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2017, 48 :208-232
[10]   Structural reliability analysis with imprecise random and interval fields [J].
Gao, Wei ;
Wu, Di ;
Gao, Kang ;
Chen, Xiaojun ;
Tin-Loi, Francis .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 55 :49-67