Influence of peak and trough levels of opioid maintenance therapy on driving aptitude

被引:24
作者
Baewert, Andjela
Gombas, Wolfgang
Schindler, Shird-Dieter
Peternell-Moelzer, Alexandra
Eder, Harald
Jagsch, Reinhold
Fischer, Gabriele
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Gen Hosp, Dept Social Psychiat, Waidhofen, Austria
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
关键词
opioid maintenance; driving aptitude; buprenorphine; methadone;
D O I
10.1159/000101548
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate driving aptitude and traffic-relevant performance at peak and trough medication levels in opioid-dependent patients receiving maintenance therapy with either buprenorphine (mean: 13.4 mg) or methadone (52.7 mg) and a medication-free control group, the Addiction Clinic at Medical University Vienna conducted a prospective, open-label trial where 40 opioid-dependent patients maintained either on buprenorphine or methadone were assessed regarding their traffic-relevant performance. Using the standardized Act and React Testsystem (ART) 2020 Standard test battery, traffic-relevant performance was analysed 1.5 h (peak level) and 20 h (trough level) after administration of opioid maintenance therapy. Results showed that patients at trough level had a significantly higher percentage of incorrect reactions (p = 0.03) and more simple errors (p = 0.02) than patients at peak level as well as methadone-maintained patients at peak level tended to perform less well than buprenorphine-maintained patients in some of the test items, e. g. methadone-maintained patients at trough level had a higher number of delayed reactions in the RST3 phase 2 test (p = 0.09) and answered fewer questions correctly in the visual structuring ability test (p = 0.04). This investigation indicates that opioid-maintained patients did not differ significantly at peak vs. trough level in the majority of the investigated items and that both substances do not appear to affect traffic-relevant performance dimensions when given as a maintenance therapy in a population where concomitant consumption would be excluded. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   DRIVING RECORDS OF METHADONE MAINTENANCE PATIENTS IN NEW-YORK STATE [J].
BABST, DV ;
NEWMAN, S ;
GORDON, N ;
WARNER, A .
JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES, 1973, 3 (04) :285-292
[2]   CEREBRAL EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM ORAL OPIOIDS IN CANCER-PATIENTS MEASURED BY CONTINUOUS REACTION-TIME [J].
BANNING, A ;
SJOGREN, P .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1990, 6 (02) :91-95
[3]   THE COGNITIVE EFFECTS OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF NARCOTIC ANALGESICS IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER PAIN [J].
BRUERA, E ;
MACMILLAN, K ;
HANSON, J ;
MACDONALD, RN .
PAIN, 1989, 39 (01) :13-16
[4]  
BUKASA B, 1999, VERKEHRSPSYCHOLOEI N, V1, P381
[5]  
BUKASA B, 2001, PSYCHOL OSTERREICH, V21, P187
[6]  
BUKASA B, 1997, INNOVATION ERFAHRUNG, P136
[7]  
Charlier C, 1998, Rev Med Liege, V53, P25
[8]  
Dittert S, 1999, NERVENARZT, V70, P457, DOI 10.1007/s001150050462
[9]   The relationship between mood state and plasma methadone concentration in maintenance patients [J].
Dyer, KR ;
White, JM ;
Foster, DJR ;
Bochner, H ;
Menelaou, A ;
Somogyi, AA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) :78-84
[10]   Methadone versus buprenorphine in pregnant addicts: a double-blind, double-dummy comparison study [J].
Fischer, G ;
Ortner, R ;
Rohrmeister, K ;
Jagsch, R ;
Baewert, A ;
Langer, M ;
Aschauer, H .
ADDICTION, 2006, 101 (02) :275-281