Design for six sigma integrated product development reference model through systematic review

被引:21
|
作者
Francisco, Marta Gomes [1 ,2 ]
Canciglieri Junior, Osiris [1 ]
Sant'Anna, Angelo Marcio Oliveira [3 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic Univ Parana PPGEPS PUCPR, Polytech Sch, Ind & Syst Engn Grad Program, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Parana IFPR, Campo Largo, Parana, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Bahia UFBA, Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Design for six sigma; PDP; Reference models for product development; Design for six sigma methods; Product development techniques; Product development and manufacturing process; DFSS; QUALITY; OPTIMIZATION; ANTECEDENTS; METHODOLOGY; EQUIPMENT;
D O I
10.1108/IJLSS-05-2019-0052
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to present a systematic review of design for six sigma (DFSS) methods applicable to the product development process (PDP) of durables goods and identify a research opportunity on the subject proposing integration of DFSS and a reference model for the PDP. In this way, through the analysis of the theoretical references identified in the scientific databases, it was possible to propose a conceptual model for the PDP oriented to the DFSS. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on the theoretical framework presented in peer-reviewed scientific research papers during the period 2000 to 2018 on the theme DFSS applied in the PDP, as well as such as the product development tools/techniques and statistics addressed. By means of key words defined by the acronyms of DFSS methods (DMADOV, ICOV, DMEDI, IDOV, DDOV, PIDOV, DMADIC, DCCDI, DMADV, IDDOV, CDOV and DCOV), DFSS and the acronym DFSS. Applying Boolean expression during the conduction of the searches through the scientific evidence at the Brazilian scientific database platform (Capes database). This database platform is maintained by coordination for the improvement of higher education personnel, which including Emerald Insight (Emerald), Scopus (Elsevier), Science Direct, SpringerLink, Taylor Francis, Scielo (Web of Science), Wiley Online Library, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), etc. It was obtained, by means of the searches, 269 papers related to subject DFSS, of which 18 papers had been critically selected for the composition of a conceptual model for the process of development of product guided to the DFSS. Findings This study presents a review of the literature (systematic review and content analysis) on DFSS and its effectiveness for the PDP. The DFSS methodology is disseminated in the scientific literature through a variety of methods that are often mistaken for the six sigma methodology - DMAIC, which is directed toward process improvement. The PDP integrated with the DFSS concepts contributes to eliminating possible failures during the design of a new product, directing to reduce costs and improve the quality of the product and process. Originality/value Through the systematic review and content analysis, it was possible to observe that the DFSS methods applied to product development are not related to the PDP reference models available in the literature. In this way, the fusion of the concepts of the DFSS methods and PDP reference models for the construction and proposition of a preliminary conceptual model DFSS oriented to the process of product development intends to contribute in the development of new products with the reduction of time, reduction of the cost, competitive price and consumer satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 795
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic literature review to assess leadership's role, traits, skills, competencies and styles for design for Lean Six Sigma program success
    Furterer, Sandra
    Antony, Jiju
    Bhasin, Sanjay
    Laureani, Alessandro
    Bhat, Shreeranga
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [32] A systematic literature review of empirical research in Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare
    Henrique, Daniel Barberato
    Godinho Filho, Moacir
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (3-4) : 429 - 449
  • [33] Six sigma project prioritization and selection methods: a systematic literature review
    Pakdil, Fatma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2022, 13 (02) : 382 - 407
  • [34] Enhancing the environmental sustainability of product through ecodesign: a systematic review
    Lee, Amos Wei Lun
    Chung, Si Ying
    Tan, Yee Shee
    Koh, Sabrina Mun Ho
    Lu, Wen Feng
    Low, Jonathan Sze Choong
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2023, 34 (10) : 814 - 843
  • [35] Development of a Green Lean Six Sigma model for public sectors
    Sreedharan, Raja, V
    Sandhya, G.
    Raju, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (02) : 238 - 255
  • [36] Design for Recycling: A Systematic Review of Approaches for Enhancing Product Recyclability
    Wu, Xiaoqing
    Gao, Qi
    Li, Wenqi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [37] INTEGRATED MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS AND DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA METHODOLOGY - CASE STUDY INSIDE R&D CENTER OF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
    Nicolaescu, Sergiu Stefan
    Kifor, Claudiu Vasile
    Receu, Ilie
    Lobont, Lucian
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION RESEARCH - REGIONAL CONFERENCE AFRICA, EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST (ICPR-AEM 2016) AND 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY AND INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (QIEM 2016), 2016, : 472 - 478
  • [38] Robust Design of an Outer Rotor Permanent Magnet Motor Through Six-Sigma Methodology Using Response Surface Surrogate Model
    Rafiee, Vahid
    Faiz, Jawad
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2019, 55 (10)
  • [39] POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCT QUALITY PLANNING IMPROVEMENT USING SELECTED TOOLS OF DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA
    Horinkova, Barbora
    Plura, Jiri
    METAL 2015: 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS, 2015, : 1945 - 1950
  • [40] Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into Lean Six Sigma DMAIC: a systematic review
    Pongboonchai-Empl, Tanawadee
    Antony, Jiju
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Komkowski, Tim
    Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2024, 35 (12) : 1403 - 1428