Delivery of full predicted energy from nutrition and the effect on mortality in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:20
作者
Ridley, Emma J. [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Andrew R. [1 ]
Hodgson, Carol L. [1 ]
Deane, Adam [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bailey, Michael [1 ]
Cooper, D. Jamie [5 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Preventat Med, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Alfred Hlth, Nutr Dept, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Acute Care Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Alfred, Dept Intens Care Med, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition; Energy; Critically ill; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ENTERAL NUTRITION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; CALORIE DELIVERY; MULTIPLE TRAUMA; DOUBLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; EFFICACY; ROUTE; TOLERABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.026
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The amount of energy required to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill adults is unknown. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of near target energy delivery to critically ill adults on mortality and other clinically relevant outcomes. Design: Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials evaluating nutrition interventions in adult critical care populations. Included studies compared delivery of >= 80% of predicted energy requirements (near target) from enteral and/or parenteral nutrition to <80% (standard care) and reported mortality. The quality of individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool, and the overall body of evidence using the GRADE approach. Fixed or random effect meta-analyses were used pending the presence of heterogeneity (I-2> 50%) when 3 or more studies reported the same outcome. Outcomes are presented as risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Ten trials with 3155 participants were included. Mortality was unaffected by the intervention (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81, 1.27, p = 0.89, I-2 = 25%). Evaluation of studies of higher quality and low risk of bias did not alter the mortality inference (3 trials, 352 participants, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49, 1.40, p = 0.19, I-2 = 39%). The quality of evidence across outcomes was very low. Conclusions: The delivery of near target energy when compared to standard care in adult critically ill patients was not associated with an effect on mortality. Because the quality of the evidence across outcomes was very low there is considerable uncertainty surrounding this estimate. This has implications for clinical utility of the evidence within the included reviews. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1925
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Lower versus higher dose of enteral caloric intake in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M. ;
Albarrak, Abdullah ;
Ferwana, Mazen ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan ;
Arabi, Yaseen M. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
[2]   The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study [J].
Alberda, Cathy ;
Gramlich, Leah ;
Jones, Naomi ;
Jeejeebhoy, Khursheed ;
Day, Andrew G. ;
Dhaliwal, Rupinder ;
Heyland, Daren K. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (10) :1728-1737
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidancefor undertaking reviews in health care
[4]   Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults [J].
Arabi, Yaseen M. ;
Aldawood, Abdulaziz S. ;
Haddad, Samir H. ;
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M. ;
Tamim, Hani M. ;
Jones, Gwynne ;
Mehta, Sangeeta ;
McIntyre, Lauralyn ;
Solaiman, Othman ;
Sakkijha, Maram H. ;
Sadat, Musharaf ;
Afesh, Lara .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (25) :2398-2408
[5]   Parenteral with enteral nutrition in the critically ill [J].
Bauer, P ;
Charpentier, C ;
Bouchet, C ;
Nace, L ;
Raffy, F ;
Gaconnet, N .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (07) :893-900
[6]  
Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[7]   Intensive Nutrition in Acute Lung Injury: A Clinical Trial (INTACT) [J].
Braunschweig, Carol A. ;
Sheean, Patricia M. ;
Peterson, Sarah J. ;
Perez, Sandra Gomez ;
Freels, Sally ;
Lateef, Omar ;
Gurka, David ;
Fantuzzi, Giamila .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2015, 39 (01) :13-20
[8]   Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: What is "best achievable" practice? An international multicenter observational study [J].
Cahill, Naomi E. ;
Dhaliwal, Rupinder ;
Day, Andrew G. ;
Jiang, Xuran ;
Heyland, Daren K. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (02) :395-401
[9]   Calorie Intake of Enteral Nutrition and Clinical Outcomes in Acutely Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Choi, Eun Young ;
Park, Dong-Ah ;
Park, Jinkyeong .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2015, 39 (03) :291-300
[10]  
Compher C, 2017, CRIT CARE MED, V45, P156, DOI [10.1097/CCM.0000000000002083, 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002083]