Estimating what US residential customers are willing to pay for resilience to large electricity outages of long duration

被引:53
作者
Baik, Sunhee [1 ]
Davis, Alexander L. [1 ]
Park, Jun Woo [2 ]
Sirinterlikci, Selin [3 ]
Morgan, M. Granger [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Comp Sci Dept, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Gen Motors, Vehicle Validat, Warren, MI USA
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONTINGENT VALUATION; TO-PAY; POWER OUTAGES; DISASTER; RISK; PREPAREDNESS; PREFERENCES; ELICITATION; LEARN; COST;
D O I
10.1038/s41560-020-0581-1
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Climate-induced extreme weather events, as well as other natural and human-caused disasters, have the potential to increase the duration and frequency of large power outages. Resilience, in the form of supplying a small amount of power to homes and communities, can mitigate outage consequences by sustaining critical electricity-dependent services. Public decisions about investing in resilience depend, in part, on how much residential customers value those critical services. Here we develop a method to estimate residential willingness-to-pay for back-up electricity services in the event of a large 10-day blackout during very cold winter weather, and then survey a sample of 483 residential customers across northeast USA using that method. Respondents were willing to pay US$1.7-2.3 kWh(-1) to sustain private demands and US$19-29 day(-1) to support their communities. Previous experience with long-duration outages and the framing of the cause of the outage (natural or human-caused) did not affect willingness-to-pay. Future resilience planning for large-area long-duration electricity outages requires, in part, estimates of what electricity consumers are willing to pay for preparedness. Baik et al. arrive at those estimates using a representative survey and find some willingness to invest in community resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 258
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1956, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VA EN SEC US
[3]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[4]  
Baik S., 2019, FRONTIERS EC WIDESPR
[5]   Illustration of a Method to Incorporate Preference Uncertainty in Benefit-Cost Analysis [J].
Baik, Sunhee ;
Davis, Alexander L. ;
Morgan, M. Granger .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2019, 39 (11) :2359-2368
[6]   Providing Limited Local Electric Service During a Major Grid Outage: A First Assessment Based on Customer Willingness to Pay [J].
Baik, Sunhee ;
Morgan, M. Granger ;
Davis, Alexander L. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (02) :272-282
[7]   Assessing the Cost of Large-Scale Power Outages to Residential Customers [J].
Baik, Sunhee ;
Davis, Alexander L. ;
Morgan, M. Granger .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (02) :283-296
[8]  
Bayrak O, 2015, EC B, V36, P218
[9]  
Beutler L.E., 2007, PSYCHOL TERRORISM, P32
[10]   Associations and the Accumulation of Preference [J].
Bhatia, Sudeep .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2013, 120 (03) :522-543