Techno-economic and operational assessment of concentrated solar power plants with a dual supporting system

被引:25
作者
Gutierrez, R. E. [1 ,2 ]
Haro, P. [1 ]
Gomez-Barea, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Chem & Environm Engn Dept, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Univ Amer Quito, Postgrad Fac, Ave Granados E12-41 & Colimes, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
Concentrated solar power; Biomass energy; Hybrid power system; Thermal energy storage; Techno-economic assessment; Dispatch strategy; THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE; PARABOLIC TROUGH; HYBRID PLANTS; THERMODYNAMIC EVALUATION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FOREST BIOMASS; RANKINE-CYCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117600
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the benefits of integrating a full renewable dual back-up system (biomass and Thermal Energy Storage (TES)) in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants. Two plants of 50 MWe capacity each are modelled and simulated, based on Parabolic Trough and Solar Tower technologies, with the integration of a biomass grate boiler in parallel to the power island. The Analytic Hierarchy Process is used as a Multi-Criteria Decision Method to compare the performance according to technical, economic, and operational criteria of 7 operating strategies. These strategies have been defined for integrating the biomass block for five levels of TES (No-TES, 5, 10, 15 and 20 h). The results show that the participation of biomass back-up favours the operation of the system as a base-load plant, increasing the capacity factor (CF) up to 71%, the net electric efficiency up to 10%, and reducing the cost of generation down to 56%, compared to stand-alone CSP plants. For the considered solar resource (Seville, Spain), reasonable generation costs (0.153 USD/kWh) can be achieved for a balanced trade-off between biomass and TES while allowing a firm energy supply (CF >= 80%) and reducing the required flexibility to the boiler. In addition, generation with a high solar share (over 50%) can be achieved with the proposed dual supporting system, favouring access to solar-driven incentives, as well as reducing the sensitivity of the system to the risks associated with biomass supply.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Design of a small scale stand-alone solar thermal co-generation plant for an isolated region in Egypt [J].
Abdelhady, Suzan ;
Borello, Domenico ;
Tortora, Eileen .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 88 :872-882
[2]   Latest developments on TES and CSP technologies - Energy and environmental issues, applications and research trends [J].
Achkari, O. ;
El Fadar, A. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 167
[3]   Economic viability of utilizing biomass energy from young stands -: The case of Finland [J].
Ahtikoski, Anssi ;
Heikkila, Jani ;
Alenius, Virpi ;
Siren, Matti .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (11) :988-996
[4]   Efficient energy storage technologies for photovoltaic systems [J].
Akbari, Hoda ;
Browne, Maria C. ;
Ortega, Anita ;
Huang, Ming Jun ;
Hewitt, Neil J. ;
Norton, Brian ;
McCormack, Sarah J. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 192 :144-168
[5]   Solar power potential of Tanzania: Identifying CSP and PV hot spots through a GIS multicriteria decision making analysis [J].
Aly, Ahmed ;
Jensen, Steen Solvang ;
Pedersen, Anders Branth .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 113 :159-175
[6]   Simulation of GEMASOLAR-based solar tower plants for the Chinese energy market: Influence of plant downsizing and location change [J].
Amadei, C. A. ;
Allesina, G. ;
Tartarini, P. ;
Wu Yuting .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 55 :366-373
[7]   Optimization of heliostat field in a thermal solar power plant with an unfired closed Joule-Brayton cycle [J].
Amelio, M. ;
Beraldi, P. ;
Ferraro, V. ;
Scornaienchi, M. ;
Rovense, F. .
71ST CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION (ATI 2016), 2016, 101 :472-479
[8]  
[Anonymous], SolarPILOT Released as Open Source
[9]  
Tool Used to Optimize Solar Power Towers | News
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Concentrating solar power: current cost and future directions