Development of Solubility Prediction Models with Ensemble Learning

被引:18
作者
Hu, Pingfan [1 ]
Jiao, Zeren [1 ]
Zhang, Zhuoran [1 ]
Wang, Qingsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02142
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The solubility parameter is widely used to select suitable solvents for polymers in the polymer-processing industry. In this study, we established a Hildebrand solubility parameter prediction model using ensemble-learning methods. The database used in the study is from the 2019 edition of the DIPPR 801 database, which includes solubility parameters for 1889 chemicals after removing invalid entries and outliers. Three machine-learning techniques including random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient (XG) boosting were implemented to develop quantitative structure-property relationship analysis (QSPR) models. Subsequently, the ensemble method was applied to achieve higher accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R-2) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were calculated to validate that ensemble-learning models achieved satisfactory predictive capabilities with the overall R-2 being 0.9793 and RMSE being 785.3313. Compared with determining the solubility parameter experimentally, the ensemble-learning models can perform a large-scale test within a few seconds. The models can be used to predict promising solvents for newly developed polymers at much lower time costs.
引用
收藏
页码:11627 / 11635
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 801 DIPPR AICHE
[2]  
[Anonymous], ery and Data Mining, DOI DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785
[3]  
Barton A.F. M., 1991, Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters, V2nd
[4]   Proper Use of the DIPPR 801 Database for Creation of Models, Methods, and Processes [J].
Bloxham, Joseph C. ;
Redd, Mark E. ;
Giles, Neil F. ;
Knotts, Thomas A. ;
Wilding, W. Vincent .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2021, 66 (01) :3-10
[5]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]   Comparison and improvement of the predictability and interpretability with ensemble learning models in QSPR applications [J].
Chen, Chia-Hsiu ;
Tanaka, Kenichi ;
Kotera, Masaaki ;
Funatsu, Kimito .
JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2020, 12 (01)
[7]  
Chen T, xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting
[8]   Binary Classification of Aqueous Solubility Using Support Vector Machines with Reduction and Recombination Feature Selection [J].
Cheng, Tiejun ;
Li, Qingliang ;
Wang, Yanli ;
Bryant, Stephen H. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2011, 51 (02) :229-236
[9]   Direct and indirect quantum mechanical QSPR hildebrand solubility parameter models [J].
Code, James E. ;
Holder, Andrew J. ;
Eick, J. David .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (07) :841-849
[10]   Solubility Parameters of Nonelectrolyte Organic Compounds: Determination Using Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Strategy [J].
Gharagheizi, Farhad ;
Eslamimanesh, Ali ;
Farjood, Farhad ;
Mohammadi, Amir H. ;
Richon, Dominique .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (19) :11382-11395