Botulinum toxin A versus bupivacaine trigger point injections for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: A randomised double blind crossover study

被引:89
作者
Graboski, CL [1 ]
Gray, S [1 ]
Burnham, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
关键词
myofascial pain syndrome; Botulinum toxin; trigger point injection;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is diverse and includes trigger point injections of various substances including local anesthetics, steroids and Botulinum toxin A (BTX A). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger point injections using BTX A versus bupivacaine, both in combination with a home-based rehabilitation program. To be enrolled, subjects first had to demonstrate responsiveness to bupivacaine trigger point injection. In this single center. double blind, randomized, crossover trial, 18 patients with MPS received trigger point injections of either 25 units Botulinum toxin A or 0.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine per trigger point. A maximum of eight trigger points were injected per subject. Subjects were followed until their pain returned to 75% or more of their pre-injection pain for two consecutive weeks, after which there was a 2 week wash-out period. The subjects then crossed over and had the same trigger. points injected with the other agent. All subjects participated in a home exercise program involving static stretches of the affected muscles. Both treatments were effective in reducing pain when compared to baseline (P = 0.0067). There was, however, no significant difference between the BTX A and 0.5% bupivacaine groups in duration or magnitude of pain relief, function, satisfaction or cost of care (cost of injectate excluded). Considering the high cost of BTX A, bupivacaine is deemed a more cost-effective injectate for NIPS. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 175
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[2]   The patient-specific functional scale: Measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction [J].
Chatman, AB ;
Hyams, SP ;
Neel, JM ;
Binkley, JM ;
Stratford, PW ;
Schomberg, A ;
Stabler, M .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 77 (08) :820-829
[3]   BOTULINUM TOXIN IN THE TREATMENT OF MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME [J].
CHESHIRE, WP ;
ABASHIAN, SW ;
MANN, JD .
PAIN, 1994, 59 (01) :65-69
[4]   Treatment of painful muscle syndromes with botulinum toxin: A review [J].
Childers, MK ;
Wilson, DJ ;
Galate, JF ;
Smith, BK .
JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 10 (02) :89-96
[5]  
COHEN J, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, P54
[6]   The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument - Reliability and validity tests [J].
Daltroy, LH ;
CatsBaril, WL ;
Katz, JN ;
Fossel, AH ;
Liang, MH .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (06) :741-748
[7]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[8]   Botulinum toxin A and chronic low back pain - A randomized, double-blind study [J].
Foster, L ;
Clapp, L ;
Erickson, M ;
Jabbari, B .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (10) :1290-1293
[9]  
Freund BJ, 2000, J RHEUMATOL, V27, P481
[10]  
Hallett M, 2000, ANN NEUROL, V48, P7