Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict

被引：3
作者：
Veatch, Robert M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Georgetown Univ, Kennedy Inst Eth, Washington, DC 20057 USA
来源：
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS | 2012年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词：
Oath; Hippocratic Oath; Professional codes; Common morality; Convergence thesis; COMMON MORALITY; OATH;
D O I：
10.1007/s11017-011-9203-z
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
The origins of professional ethical codes and oaths are explored. Their legitimacy and usefulness within the profession are questioned and an alternative ethical source is suggested. This source relies on a commonly shared, naturally knowable set of principles known as common morality.
引用
收藏
页码：33 / 43
页数：11
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]  
Irish D. P., 1965, J CHRON DIS, V18, P175
[22]   Dignity is a useless concept - It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy [J].
Macklin, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7429) :1419-1420
[23]   MORAL CONCERNS AND APPEALS TO RIGHTS AND DUTIES [J].
MACKLIN, R .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1976, 6 (05) :31-&
[24]  
O'Neill Onora., 2007, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics
[25]  
Orr RD, 1997, J CLIN ETHIC, V8, P377
[26]  
Roberts Oral., 1995, EXPECT MIRACLE MY LI
[27]  
Ross D., 1930, The right and the good
[28]   MEDICINES ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES [J].
ROTH, RB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 215 (12) :1956-&
[29]  
Russell Brock Lord, 1970, P ROY SOC MED, V63, P661
[30]  
Taylor James., 2005, STAKES KIDNEYS WHY M
1234