Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict

被引：3
作者：
Veatch, Robert M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Georgetown Univ, Kennedy Inst Eth, Washington, DC 20057 USA
来源：
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS | 2012年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词：
Oath; Hippocratic Oath; Professional codes; Common morality; Convergence thesis; COMMON MORALITY; OATH;
D O I：
10.1007/s11017-011-9203-z
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
The origins of professional ethical codes and oaths are explored. Their legitimacy and usefulness within the profession are questioned and an alternative ethical source is suggested. This source relies on a commonly shared, naturally knowable set of principles known as common morality.
引用
收藏
页码：33 / 43
页数：11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Annas GJ., 2005, American Bioethics
[2]  
Crossing civil rights and health law boundaries
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BELM REP ETH PRINC G
[4]  
Aquinas Thomas, 1915, SUMMA THEOLOGICA
[5]  
Barth Karl., 1938, KNOWLEDGE GOD SERVIC
[6]   A defense of the common morality [J].
Beauchamp, TL .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2003, 13 (03) :259-274
[7]  
Beauchamp TL, 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
[8]   Consistency, common morality, and reflective equilibrium [J].
Brand-Ballard, J .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2003, 13 (03) :231-258
[9]  
Brody B., 1988, LIFE DEATH DECISION
[10]  
Carey EJ, 1928, BULL ASSOC AM MED CO, V3, P159
1234