Improving primary care identification of familial breast cancer risk using proactive invitation and decision support

被引:8
|
作者
Qureshi, Nadeem [1 ]
Dutton, Brittany [1 ]
Weng, Stephen [1 ]
Sheehan, Christina [1 ]
Chorley, Wendy [2 ]
Robertson, John F. R. [3 ]
Kendrick, Denise [1 ]
Kai, Joe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Sch Med, Div Primary Care, 13th Floor,Tower Bldg, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Hosp Derby & Burton NHS Fdn Trust, Royal Derby Hosp, Derby, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
关键词
Primary health care; Breast cancer; Family history; Medical genetics; Decision support; Risk assessment; YOUNG-WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMMUNICATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; HISTORY; BRCA2;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-020-00188-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Family history of breast cancer is a key risk factor, accounting for up to 10% of cancers. We evaluated the proactive assessment of familial breast cancer (FBC) risk in primary care. Eligible women (30 to 60 years) were recruited from eight English general practices. Practices were trained on FBC risk assessment. In four randomly-assigned practices, women were invited to complete a validated, postal family history questionnaire, which practice staff inputted into decision support software to determine cancer risk. Those with increased risk were offered specialist referral. Usual care was observed in the other four practices. In intervention practices, 1127/7012 women (16.1%) returned family history questionnaires, comprising 1105 (98%) self-reported white ethnicity and 446 (39.6%) educated to University undergraduate or equivalent qualification, with 119 (10.6%) identified at increased breast cancer risk and offered referral. Sixty-seven (56%) women recommended referral were less than 50 years old. From 66 women attending specialists, 26 (39.4%) were confirmed to have high risk and recommended annual surveillance (40-60 years) and surgical prevention; while 30 (45.5%) were confirmed at moderate risk, with 19 offered annual surveillance (40-50 years). The remaining 10 (15.2%) managed in primary care. None were recommended chemoprevention. In usual care practices, only ten women consulted with concerns about breast cancer family history. This study demonstrated proactive risk assessment in primary care enables accurate identification of women, including many younger women, at increased risk of breast cancer. To improve generalisability across the population, more active methods of engagement need to be explored. Trial registration: CRUK Clinical Trials Database11779.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast cancer risk evaluation for the primary care physician
    Klassen, Christine L.
    Gilman, Elizabeth
    Kaur, Aparna
    Lester, Sara P.
    Pruthi, Sandhya
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 89 (03) : 139 - 146
  • [32] Diffusion of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Primary Care
    Guerra, Carmen E.
    Sherman, Melani
    Armstrong, Katrina
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (03) : 272 - 279
  • [33] Improving identification of symptomatic cancer at primary care clinics: A predictive modeling analysis in Botswana
    Molebatsi, Kesaobaka
    Iyer, Hari S.
    Kohler, Racquel E.
    Gabegwe, Kemiso
    Nkele, Isaac
    Rabasha, Bokang
    Botebele, Kerapetse
    Barak, Tomer
    Balosang, Siamisang
    Tapela, Neo M.
    Dryden-Peterson, Scott L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 151 (10) : 1663 - 1673
  • [34] Identifying priority areas to support primary care engagement in breast cancer survivorship care: A Delphi study
    Mikesell, Lisa
    O'Malley, Denalee M.
    Kurtzman, Rachel T.
    Howard, Jenna
    Bates, Benjamin
    Hemler, Jennifer R.
    Fadem, Sarah J.
    Ferrante, Jeanne M.
    Bator, Alicja
    Hudson, Shawna V.
    Crabtree, Benjamin F.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09):
  • [35] Breast cancer risk communication: Assessment of primary care physicians by standardized patients
    Culver, Julie O.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Reynolds, Susan E.
    Pinsky, Linda E.
    Press, Nancy
    Burke, Wylie
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (10) : 735 - 741
  • [36] An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers
    Speller, Brittany
    Sissons, Amanda
    Daly, Corinne
    Facey, Marcia
    Kennedy, Erin
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [37] Use of Clinical Decision Support to Improve Primary Care Identification and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
    Litvin, Cara B.
    Hyer, J. Madison
    Ornstein, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (05) : 604 - 612
  • [38] Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Kukafka, Rita
    Pan, Samuel
    Silverman, Thomas
    Zhang, Tianmai
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Fleck, Elaine
    Younge, Richard G.
    Trivedi, Meghna S.
    McGuinness, Julia E.
    He, Ting
    Dimond, Jill
    Crew, Katherine D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (07)
  • [39] Using Hospital Claim Data to Develop Referral Decision Support Systems: Improving Patient Flow from The Primary Care
    Sanjaya, Guardian Yoki
    Lazuardi, Lutfan
    Hasanbasri, Mubasysyir
    Kusnanto, Hari
    FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 : 441 - 448
  • [40] Women at familial risk of breast cancer electing for prophylactic mastectomy: frequencies, procedures, and decision-making characteristics
    Schott, Sarah
    Vetter, Lisa
    Keller, Monika
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Golatta, Michael
    Eismann, Sabine
    Dikow, Nicola
    Evers, Christina
    Sohn, Christof
    Heil, Joerg
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (06) : 1451 - 1458