Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current practice and results of renal transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Yip, Sidney Kam-Hung [1 ]
Leung, Chi-Bon [2 ]
Szeto, Cheuk-Chun [2 ]
Lam, Nga-Yee [1 ]
Chan, Chi-Kwok [1 ]
Tong, Yuen-Fan [2 ]
Ng, Chi-Fai [1 ]
Kwan, Bonnie Ching-Ha [2 ]
Chow, Kai-Ming [2 ]
Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin [1 ]
Hou, Simon See-Ming [1 ]
Yu, Alex Wai-Yin [2 ]
Li, Philip Kam-Tao [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney transplant; donor nephrectomy; outcome; chronic renal failure; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-1633.2011.00575.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: In 2009, 1659 patients with end-stage renal failure in Hong Kong were waiting for a renal transplant. The overall number of renal transplants carried out locally remains low, with an even lower number being live donor donations. Yet, live donor kidney transplantation yields results that are consistently superior to those of deceased donor kidney transplantation, and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is increasingly accepted worldwide as a safe and preferred surgical option. We aim to evaluate the outcome of LDN in our setting, and to compare with that of deceased donors in this retrospective review. Patients and Methods: A total of 12 patients received LDN over the study period of 2006-2009. Standard left transperitoneal LDN was carried out. Grafts including three with double vessels were prepared using the bench technique. The postoperative outcomes up to 1 year for both the donors and the recipients were studied. Contemporary results for the 47 deceased donor kidneys were studied and compared. Results: All donors had an eventful recovery. The operating time was 225.0 +/- 67.4 min. The hospital stay was 5.6 +/- 2.3 days. The recipient outcomes including hospital stay and creatinine levels at discharge and 1 year were 11 days, 121 umol/L and 116 umol/L, respectively. Specifically, no ureteric stricture or graft loss was noted at the 1-year follow up. Recipient complications included haematoma (1 patient), renal artery stenosis (1 patient) and redo of vascular anastomosis (1 patient). In contrast, the deceased donor graft recipients had a hospital stay of 11 days, and creatinine levels of 205 umol/L on discharge and 205 umol/L at 1 year, respectively. The delayed graft function rates for the live donor and deceased donors group were 0% and 14.9%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rates were 100% and 87.2% respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the donor morbidity rate was low, as reflected by the short hospital stay. Also, the overall parameters of recipients were good. In particular, no ureteric stricture was noted, and graft survival was 100% at 1 year. Living donor kidney transplant program using the laparoscopic technique is a viable option to improve the pool of kidneys for transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chylous ascites after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Tiong, Ho Yee
    Goel, Raj K.
    White, Wesley M.
    Goldfarb, David A.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2015, 8 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [32] Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy
    Hirose, Takayuki
    Hotta, Kiyohiko
    Iwami, Daiki
    Harada, Hiroshi
    Morita, Ken
    Tanabe, Tatsu
    Sasaki, Hajime
    Fukuzawa, Nobuyuki
    Seki, Toshimori
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (12) : 1120 - 1124
  • [33] Renal artery clip dislodgement during hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Maartense, S
    Heintjes, RJ
    Idu, M
    Bemelman, FJ
    Bemelman, WA
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (11): : 1851 - 1851
  • [34] Current issues in living donor nephrectomy
    Jones, KW
    Peters, TG
    Charlton, RK
    Lenz, BJ
    Walker, GW
    Repper, S
    Crews, MJ
    Antonucci, LE
    Peters, EJ
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 11 (05) : 505 - 510
  • [35] Renal artery clip dislodgement during hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    S. Maartense
    R. J. Heintjes
    M. Idu
    F. J. Bemelman
    W. A. Bemelman
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 1851 - 1851
  • [36] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in unusual venous anatomy - donor and recepient implications
    Patil, Avinash Bapusaheb
    Javali, Tarun Dilip
    Nagaraj, Harohalli K.
    Babu, S. M. L. Prakash
    Nayak, Arvind
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2017, 43 (04): : 671 - 678
  • [37] Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Greenstein, MA
    Harkaway, R
    Badosa, F
    Ginsberg, P
    Yang, SL
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) : 356 - 359
  • [38] Learning Curve for Laparoendoscopic Single-Incision Live Donor Nephrectomy: Implications for Laparoendoscopic Practice and Training
    Troppmann, Christoph
    Santhanakrishnan, Chandrasekar
    Fananapazir, Ghaneh
    Troppmann, Kathrin M.
    Perez, Richard V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (05): : 482 - 488
  • [39] Management of intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Wadhawan, Randeep
    Raul, Subrat
    Gupta, Muneendra
    Verma, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2012, 8 (04) : 149 - 151
  • [40] Short-term impact of carbon dioxide, helium, and gasless laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient
    Hazebroek, EJ
    de Bruin, RWF
    Bouvy, ND
    van Duikeren, S
    Bonthuis, F
    Marquet, RL
    Bajema, IM
    Hayes, DP
    IJzermans, JNM
    Bonjer, HJ
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (02): : 245 - 251