Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current practice and results of renal transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Yip, Sidney Kam-Hung [1 ]
Leung, Chi-Bon [2 ]
Szeto, Cheuk-Chun [2 ]
Lam, Nga-Yee [1 ]
Chan, Chi-Kwok [1 ]
Tong, Yuen-Fan [2 ]
Ng, Chi-Fai [1 ]
Kwan, Bonnie Ching-Ha [2 ]
Chow, Kai-Ming [2 ]
Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin [1 ]
Hou, Simon See-Ming [1 ]
Yu, Alex Wai-Yin [2 ]
Li, Philip Kam-Tao [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney transplant; donor nephrectomy; outcome; chronic renal failure; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-1633.2011.00575.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: In 2009, 1659 patients with end-stage renal failure in Hong Kong were waiting for a renal transplant. The overall number of renal transplants carried out locally remains low, with an even lower number being live donor donations. Yet, live donor kidney transplantation yields results that are consistently superior to those of deceased donor kidney transplantation, and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is increasingly accepted worldwide as a safe and preferred surgical option. We aim to evaluate the outcome of LDN in our setting, and to compare with that of deceased donors in this retrospective review. Patients and Methods: A total of 12 patients received LDN over the study period of 2006-2009. Standard left transperitoneal LDN was carried out. Grafts including three with double vessels were prepared using the bench technique. The postoperative outcomes up to 1 year for both the donors and the recipients were studied. Contemporary results for the 47 deceased donor kidneys were studied and compared. Results: All donors had an eventful recovery. The operating time was 225.0 +/- 67.4 min. The hospital stay was 5.6 +/- 2.3 days. The recipient outcomes including hospital stay and creatinine levels at discharge and 1 year were 11 days, 121 umol/L and 116 umol/L, respectively. Specifically, no ureteric stricture or graft loss was noted at the 1-year follow up. Recipient complications included haematoma (1 patient), renal artery stenosis (1 patient) and redo of vascular anastomosis (1 patient). In contrast, the deceased donor graft recipients had a hospital stay of 11 days, and creatinine levels of 205 umol/L on discharge and 205 umol/L at 1 year, respectively. The delayed graft function rates for the live donor and deceased donors group were 0% and 14.9%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rates were 100% and 87.2% respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the donor morbidity rate was low, as reflected by the short hospital stay. Also, the overall parameters of recipients were good. In particular, no ureteric stricture was noted, and graft survival was 100% at 1 year. Living donor kidney transplant program using the laparoscopic technique is a viable option to improve the pool of kidneys for transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Right versus left fully robotic live donor nephrectomy and open kidney transplantation: Does the laterality of the donor kidney really matter?
    Ruch, Brianna
    Tsering, Deki
    Bhati, Chandra
    Kumar, Dhiren
    Saeed, Muhammad
    Lee, Seung Duk
    Khan, Aamir
    Imai, Daisuke
    Bruno, David
    Levy, Marlon
    Cotterell, Adrian
    Sharma, Amit
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04) : 453 - 460
  • [22] Determinants of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes
    Hu, Jim C.
    Liu, Chia-Hung
    Treat, Eric G.
    Ernest, Alexander
    Veale, Jeffrey
    Carter, Stacey
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Blumberg, Jeremy M.
    Schulam, Peter G.
    Gritsch, Hans A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (03) : 659 - 664
  • [23] Ex-vivo donor partial nephrectomy at the time of donor-directed renal transplantation
    Wendel, Eric C.
    Patel, Raunak D.
    Canter, Daniel J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 9740 - 9742
  • [24] Mini-laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the use of 3-mm instruments and laparoscope
    Alberto Breda
    Ivan Schwartzmann
    Esteban Emiliani
    Oscar Rodriguez-Faba
    Lluis Gausa
    Jorge Caffaratti
    Xavier Ponce de León
    Humberto Villavicencio
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 707 - 712
  • [25] Mini-laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the use of 3-mm instruments and laparoscope
    Breda, Alberto
    Schwartzmann, Ivan
    Emiliani, Esteban
    Rodriguez-Faba, Oscar
    Gausa, Lluis
    Caffaratti, Jorge
    Ponce de Leon, Xavier
    Villavicencio, Humberto
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 707 - 712
  • [26] Duplicated Inferior Vena Cava in Live-Related Renal Transplant Donor Nephrectomy
    Kamath, K. Annappa
    Vasudevan, S.
    Pandey, Himanshu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 17 (01) : 136 - 138
  • [27] Early and Late Graft Function after Laparoscopic Hand-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy for Living Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Open Donor Nephrectomy
    Hoda, M. R.
    Hamza, A.
    Greco, F.
    Wagner, S.
    Fischer, K.
    Fornara, P.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [28] Clipless management of the renal vein during hand-assist laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Rosenblatt G.S.
    Conlin M.J.
    BMC Urology, 6 (1)
  • [29] Single port transumbilical laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Kocak, Burak
    Kucukkartallar, Tevfik
    Yankol, Yucel
    Topaloglu, Serdar
    Acarli, Koray
    Kalayoglu, Munci
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 36 (01): : 97 - 101
  • [30] Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: An Update
    Abraham, Armando Salim Munoz
    Morsi, Mahmoud
    Vianna, Rodrigo
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2025, 26 (01)