Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current practice and results of renal transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Yip, Sidney Kam-Hung [1 ]
Leung, Chi-Bon [2 ]
Szeto, Cheuk-Chun [2 ]
Lam, Nga-Yee [1 ]
Chan, Chi-Kwok [1 ]
Tong, Yuen-Fan [2 ]
Ng, Chi-Fai [1 ]
Kwan, Bonnie Ching-Ha [2 ]
Chow, Kai-Ming [2 ]
Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin [1 ]
Hou, Simon See-Ming [1 ]
Yu, Alex Wai-Yin [2 ]
Li, Philip Kam-Tao [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney transplant; donor nephrectomy; outcome; chronic renal failure; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-1633.2011.00575.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: In 2009, 1659 patients with end-stage renal failure in Hong Kong were waiting for a renal transplant. The overall number of renal transplants carried out locally remains low, with an even lower number being live donor donations. Yet, live donor kidney transplantation yields results that are consistently superior to those of deceased donor kidney transplantation, and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is increasingly accepted worldwide as a safe and preferred surgical option. We aim to evaluate the outcome of LDN in our setting, and to compare with that of deceased donors in this retrospective review. Patients and Methods: A total of 12 patients received LDN over the study period of 2006-2009. Standard left transperitoneal LDN was carried out. Grafts including three with double vessels were prepared using the bench technique. The postoperative outcomes up to 1 year for both the donors and the recipients were studied. Contemporary results for the 47 deceased donor kidneys were studied and compared. Results: All donors had an eventful recovery. The operating time was 225.0 +/- 67.4 min. The hospital stay was 5.6 +/- 2.3 days. The recipient outcomes including hospital stay and creatinine levels at discharge and 1 year were 11 days, 121 umol/L and 116 umol/L, respectively. Specifically, no ureteric stricture or graft loss was noted at the 1-year follow up. Recipient complications included haematoma (1 patient), renal artery stenosis (1 patient) and redo of vascular anastomosis (1 patient). In contrast, the deceased donor graft recipients had a hospital stay of 11 days, and creatinine levels of 205 umol/L on discharge and 205 umol/L at 1 year, respectively. The delayed graft function rates for the live donor and deceased donors group were 0% and 14.9%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rates were 100% and 87.2% respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the donor morbidity rate was low, as reflected by the short hospital stay. Also, the overall parameters of recipients were good. In particular, no ureteric stricture was noted, and graft survival was 100% at 1 year. Living donor kidney transplant program using the laparoscopic technique is a viable option to improve the pool of kidneys for transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy and Impact of Double Renal Arteries: Results From Two Transplant Centres
    Kuo, Tricia
    Yip, Sidney Kam-Hung
    Ng, Chi Fai
    Ng, Lay Guat
    Cheng, Christopher Wai-Sam
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 33 (02) : 70 - 75
  • [2] Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Haifeng
    Chen, Rao
    Li, Tengfang
    Peng, Longkai
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 33 (01)
  • [3] Is Laparoscopic Technique Suitable for Initial Experience in Live Donor Nephrectomy? Results of The First 51 Cases
    Akin, Emrah
    Altintoprak, Fatih
    Firat, Necattin
    Dheir, Hamad
    Bas, Enes
    Demirci, Taner
    Kamburoglu, Burak
    Celebi, Fehmi
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (06):
  • [4] Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Musk, Gabrielle
    Rea, Alethea
    He, Bulang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2793 - 2799
  • [5] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study
    Buell, JF
    Lee, L
    Martin, JE
    Dake, NA
    Cavanaugh, TM
    Hanaway, MJ
    Weiskittel, P
    Munda, R
    Alexander, JW
    Cardi, M
    Peddi, VR
    Zavala, EY
    Berilla, E
    Clippard, M
    First, MR
    Woodle, ES
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [6] Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy
    Zi Qin Ng
    Gabrielle Musk
    Alethea Rea
    Bulang He
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 2793 - 2799
  • [7] Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: modifications for developing nations
    Kumar, A
    Chaudhary, H
    Srivastava, A
    Raghavendran, M
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (09) : 1291 - 1295
  • [8] First live donor nephrectomy with abdominal tortuous aorta and two renal arteries: A renal transplantation case report
    Demir, Mesut
    Yesildal, Cumhur
    Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hizir
    Kirecci, Sinan Levent
    Dokucu, Ali Ihsan
    UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2020, 29
  • [9] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    He, Bulang
    Mitchell, Andrew
    Delriviere, Luc
    Shannon, Tom
    Pemberton, Richard
    Tan, Andrew
    Bremner, Alexandra
    Vivian, Justin
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (03) : 159 - 163
  • [10] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Minnee, R. C.
    Idu, M. M.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 68 (05) : 199 - 206