Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: A case report

被引:80
作者
Falcone, T
Goldberg, J
Garcia-Ruiz, A
Margossian, H
Stevens, L
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Gynecol & Obstet A 80, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A | 1999年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/lap.1999.9.107
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Optical magnification and long instrumentation significantly increase surgical tremor, which makes laparoscopic microsuturing difficult. Therefore, laparoscopic tubal anastomosis has not gained wide acceptance among gynecologic surgeons. Robotic assistance facilitates this type of procedure by filtering tremor, reducing the surgeon's fatigue, and scaling the maneuvers. The authors have successfully completed a case of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using a "master-slave" robot to perform the standard microsuturing technique. A 33-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 2, requested reversal of her previous tubal ligature. A right isthmic-isthmic tubal anastomosis was performed laparoscopically, with faithful adherence to the authors' standard technique applied at laparotomy. Full robotic assistance was used to anastomose the tube. A chromotubation test showed anastomotic patency without leak. The patient recovered uneventfully after surgery and was discharged within 24 h after the procedure. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with full robotic assistance is feasible and safe in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 113
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] BEGIN E, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P6
  • [2] An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper
    Berguer, R
    Gerber, S
    Kilpatrick, G
    Beckley, D
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (06): : 805 - 808
  • [3] Cushieri A, 1995, TISSUE APPROXIMATION, P42
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC TUBAL ANASTOMOSIS (THE ONE STITCH TECHNIQUE) - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS
    DUBUISSON, JB
    SWOLIN, K
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (08) : 2044 - 2046
  • [5] ROBOTIC INTERACTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    GAGNER, M
    BEGIN, E
    HURTEAU, R
    POMP, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 343 (8897) : 596 - 597
  • [6] Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks
    Garcia-Ruiz, A
    Gagner, M
    Miller, JH
    Steiner, CP
    Hahn, JF
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (09) : 957 - 961
  • [7] Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft
    GarciaRuiz, A
    Smedira, NG
    Loop, FD
    Hahn, JF
    Miller, JH
    Steiner, CP
    Gagner, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1997, 7 (05): : 277 - 283
  • [8] GOMEL V, 1980, FERTIL STERIL, V33, P587
  • [9] KATZ E, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P497
  • [10] COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC VERSUS HUMAN LAPAROSCOPIC CAMERA CONTROL
    KAVOUSSI, LR
    MOORE, RG
    ADAMS, JB
    PARTIN, AW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) : 2134 - 2136