Seasonality of coastal phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea: Influence of salinity and eutrophication

被引:140
作者
Gasiunaite, ZR
Cardoso, AC
Heiskanen, AS
Henriksen, P
Kauppila, P
Olenina, I
Pilkaityte, R
Purina, I
Razinkovas, A
Sagert, S
Schubert, H
Wasmund, N
机构
[1] Klaipeda Univ, Coastal Res & Planning Inst, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
[2] Ctr Marine Res, LT-91149 Klaipeda, Lithuania
[3] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
[4] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Marine Ecol, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Finnish Environm Inst, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[6] Latvian State Univ, Inst Aquat Ecol, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[7] Univ Rostock, Inst Aquat Ecol, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
[8] Baltic Sea Res Inst, D-18119 Warnemunde, Germany
关键词
nutrients; geographic gradient; indicators;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecss.2005.05.018
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
In this study long-term (1984-2001) phytoplankton and physico-chemical monitoring data representing different salinity regimes of the Baltic Sea were compiled from HELCOM, national and regional databases. The aim was to define seasonal succession patterns of phytoplankton in seven different areas of the Baltic sea, characterised by different salinity, climate, and trophic conditions and to delineate a set of phytoplankton community indicators that are independent of season and salinity, but indicative of trophic status of different coastal areas. The cluster analysis of the combined data set resulted in eight phytoplankton community types, common for all locations, and characterised by different taxonomic composition representing different stages of seasonal succession. A hierarchy of explanatory variables that best predicted the communities, dominated by either diatoms, cyanophytes, cryptophytes or dinoflagellates, was revealed through a redundancy analysis (RDA). Nutrients were not found to be significant factors shaping the common phytoplankton community types for all locations. RDA analysis at the location level, covering all seasonal succession stages, confirmed phytoplankton community composition to be sensitive to nutrient concentrations. Even with the limitations of utilizing databases from different sources we identified community types that were indicative of climatic conditions (particularly temperature), salinity and eutrophication. The dominance of cyanobacteria as such, would not be an appropriate indicator of trophic conditions in the Baltic Sea, in the areas where cyanobacteria blooms occur naturally. The structure of both diatom- and cyanophyte-dominated communities is governed by salinity, and thus the abundances of these groups cannot be directly used as an indicator across the whole Baltic Sea. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Andrushaitis A, 1995, ECOSYSTEM GULF RIGA, P32
[2]  
aromskis R., 1996, Oceans, Seas, Estuaries
[3]   Cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea:: Natural or human-induced? [J].
Bianchi, TS ;
Engelhaupt, E ;
Westman, P ;
Andrén, T ;
Rolff, C ;
Elmgren, R .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2000, 45 (03) :716-726
[4]  
CLARKE K. R., 1997, CHANGE MARINE COMMUN
[5]   Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem [J].
Cloern, JE .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2001, 210 :223-253
[6]  
Edler L., 1979, Baltic Mar Biol Publ, V5, P1
[7]  
Finni T, 2001, AMBIO, V30, P172, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0172:THOCBI]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Temporal and spatial patterns of crustacean zooplankton dynamics in a transitional lagoon ecosystem [J].
Gasiunaite, ZR ;
Razinkovas, A .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2004, 514 (1-3) :139-149
[10]  
Gasiunaitè ZR, 2000, INT REV HYDROBIOL, V85, P653, DOI 10.1002/1522-2632(200011)85:5/6<653::AID-IROH653>3.0.CO