Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:23
作者
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel [1 ]
Wang, Yu [2 ]
McGorray, Susan [2 ]
Saleem, Mohammed D. [3 ]
Mamani, Semiramis L. Carbajal [3 ]
Pomputius, Ariel F. [4 ]
Markham, Merry-Jennifer [3 ]
Castagno, Jacqueline C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, POB 100294, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr Lib, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Ovarian cancer; Cytoreductive surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; DEBULKING SURGERY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; RECTAL-CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-018-0838-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in other gynecologic cancers has shown benefits with similar oncologic outcomes. However, the biology and complexity of surgery for ovarian cancer may preclude this approach for ovarian cancer patients. Our objective is to assess feasibility to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients via minimally invasive surgery. Our data sources include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biosis, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model with DerSimonian and Laird estimator for the amount of heterogeneity to estimate the pooled outcomes. A funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to test publication bias. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. There were 6 studies (3 prospective, 3 retrospective) that met the criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 3231 patients, 567 were in the minimally invasive group and 2664 in the laparotomy group. Both groups were similar in stage and serous histology. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 74.50% (95% CI 40.41-97.65%) and 53.10% (95% CI 4.88-97.75%) of patients in the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between these 2 pooled proportions (p=0.52). Three studies compared minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in obtaining complete cytoreductive surgery [OR=0.90 (95% CI 0.70-1.16; p=0.43)]. A symmetrical funnel plot indicated no publication bias. The pooled proportion for grade>2 postoperative complications was not significant among the laparoscopy group [3.11% (95% CI 0.00-10.24%; p=0.15)]. Complete cytoreductive surgery appears feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery in selected advanced ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Ackroyd S.A. ;
Thomas S. ;
Angel C. ;
Moore R. ;
Meacham P.J. ;
DuBeshter B. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (2) :245-250
[2]   Minimally invasive versus standard laparotomic interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm: A single-institution retrospective case-control study [J].
Alletti, S. Gueli ;
Petrillo, M. ;
Vizzielli, G. ;
Bottoni, C. ;
Nardelli, F. ;
Costantini, B. ;
Quagliozzi, L. ;
Gallotta, V. ;
Scambia, G. ;
Fagotti, A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 143 (03) :516-520
[3]   Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study [J].
Alletti, Salvatore Gueli ;
Bottoni, Carolina ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Gallotta, Valerio ;
Chiantera, Vito ;
Costantini, Barbara ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Ercoli, Alfredo ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Fagotti, Anna .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) :503.e1-503.e6
[4]  
[Anonymous], PRACT GUID ONC OV CA
[5]   Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Aziz, O ;
Constantinides, V ;
Tekkis, PP ;
Athanasiou, T ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Paraskeva, P ;
Darzi, AW ;
Heriot, AG .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :413-424
[6]   Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Pinkney, Thomas ;
Rogers, Chris ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (02) :211-218
[7]   Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Redefining 'optimal' residual disease [J].
Chang, Suk-Joon ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (02) :483-492
[8]   Laparoscopic Debulking Surgery in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Corrado, Giacomo ;
Mancini, Emanuela ;
Cutillo, Giuseppe ;
Baiocco, Ermelinda ;
Vici, Patrizia ;
Sergi, Domenico ;
Patrizi, Lodovico ;
Saltari, Maria ;
Baffa, Alberto ;
Vizza, Enrico .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) :1253-1257
[9]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[10]   Correlation between Surgeon's assessment and radiographic evaluation of residual disease in women with advanced stage ovarian cancer reported to have undergone optimal surgical cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Eskander, Ramez N. ;
Kauderer, James ;
Tewari, Krishnansu S. ;
Mannel, Robert S. ;
Bristow, Robert E. ;
O'Malley, David M. ;
Rubin, Stephen C. ;
Glaser, Gretchen E. ;
Hamilton, Chad A. ;
Fujiwara, Keiichi ;
Huh, Warner K. ;
Ueland, Frederick ;
Stephan, Jean-Marie ;
Burger, Robert A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 (03) :525-530