Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer

被引:20
作者
Tian, HuaKai [1 ,2 ]
Ning, ZhiKun [3 ]
Zong, Zhen [2 ]
Liu, Jiang [2 ]
Hu, CeGui [2 ]
Ying, HouQun [4 ]
Li, Hui [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Day Ward, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Jiangxi Prov Key Lab Lab Med, Dept Nucl Med, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
early gastric cancer; lymph node metastasis; machine learning; predictive model; regularized dual averaging (RDA); SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2021.759013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish the best early gastric cancer lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction model through machine learning (ML) to better guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. MethodsWe screened gastric cancer patients with T1a and T1b stages from 2010 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and collected the clinicopathological data of patients with early gastric cancer who were treated with surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2014 to December 2016. At the same time, we applied 7 ML algorithms-the generalized linear model (GLM), RPART, random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine (SVM), regularized dual averaging (RDA), and the neural network (NNET)-and combined them with patient pathological information to develop the best prediction model for early gastric cancer lymph node metastasis. Among the SEER set, 80% were randomly selected to train the models, while the remaining 20% were used for testing. The data from the Second Affiliated Hospital were considered as the external verification set. Finally, we used the AUROC, F1-score value, sensitivity, and specificity to evaluate the performance of the model. ResultsThe tumour size, tumour grade, and depth of tumour invasion were independent risk factors for early gastric cancer LNM. Comprehensive comparison of the prediction model performance of the training set and test set showed that the RDA model had the best prediction performance (F1-score = 0.773; AUROC = 0.742). The AUROC of the external validation set was 0.73. ConclusionsTumour size, tumour grade, and depth of tumour invasion were independent risk factors for early gastric cancer LNM. ML predicted LNM risk more accurately, and the RDA model had the best predictive performance and could better guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Changing Trends in Stomach Cancer Throughout the World [J].
Balakrishnan M. ;
George R. ;
Sharma A. ;
Graham D.Y. .
Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2017, 19 (8)
[2]   Indications and Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [J].
Bhatt, Amit ;
Abe, Seiichiro ;
Kumaravel, Arthi ;
Vargo, John ;
Saito, Yutaka .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (06) :784-791
[3]   What is Machine Learning? A Primer for the Epidemiologist [J].
Bi, Qifang ;
Goodman, Katherine E. ;
Kaminsky, Joshua ;
Lessler, Justin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 188 (12) :2222-2239
[4]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[5]   Feasibility of endoscopic treatment and predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer [J].
Chu, Yu-Ning ;
Yu, Ya-Nan ;
Jing, Xue ;
Mao, Tao ;
Chen, Yun-Qing ;
Zhou, Xiao-Bin ;
Song, Wen ;
Zhao, Xian-Zhi ;
Tian, Zi-Bin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (35) :5344-5355
[6]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[7]   Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy [J].
Fleuren, Lucas M. ;
Klausch, Thomas L. T. ;
Zwager, Charlotte L. ;
Schoonmade, Linda J. ;
Guo, Tingjie ;
Roggeveen, Luca F. ;
Swart, Eleonora L. ;
Girbes, Armand R. J. ;
Thoral, Patrick ;
Ercole, Ari ;
Hoogendoorn, Mark ;
Elbers, Paul W. G. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (03) :383-400
[8]   Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Gu, Lihu ;
Khadaroo, Parikshit A. ;
Chen, Liangliang ;
Li, Xinlong ;
Zhu, Hepan ;
Zhong, Xin ;
Pan, Junhai ;
Chen, Manman .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (07) :1493-1501
[9]   eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine [J].
Handelman, G. S. ;
Kok, H. K. ;
Chandra, R. V. ;
Razavi, A. H. ;
Lee, M. J. ;
Asadi, H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 284 (06) :603-619
[10]   Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) [J].
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2021, 24 (01) :1-21