Measuring morality in infancy: A scoping methodological review

被引:0
作者
Lavoie, Jennifer [1 ]
Murray, Aja L. [2 ]
Skinner, Guy [3 ]
Janiczek, Emilia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Moray House Sch Educ & Sport, Holyrood Rd, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
关键词
infancy; moral development; moral reasoning; CHILDRENS CONSCIENCE; PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIALIZATION; TEMPERAMENT; EXPECTATION; PATHWAYS; SECURITY; FOUNDATIONS; COOPERATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1002/icd.2298
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We conducted a scoping review of methods that have been used to measure infants' (under age 2) moral development. We aimed to assess the state of knowledge through a thematic overview of the methodologies that have been used and the specific constructs studied. We found that the majority of studies used an experimental methodology, and within this, infants' actual behaviour and their evaluations were the most common sources of information. An evidence map depicting concept delineation between studies and presenting concepts as related to an underlying moral sense, as prosocial (emotion and behaviour), and as antisocial components (emotion and behaviour) is provided. Just under one-third of studies were longitudinal, and a high percentage reported a statistically significant longitudinal relation for moral development. Results highlight a need for measures that can be used longitudinally at different stages of development so that trajectories can be observed and mapped to behavioural outcomes, such as conduct problems.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] Arksey H., 2005, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • [2] Bloom P., 2013, Just babies: The origins of good and evil
  • [3] Bronfenbrenner U., 2005, MAKING HUMAN BEINGS, P106
  • [4] Why (and how) should we study the interplay between emotional arousal, Theory of Mind, and inhibitory control to understand moral cognition?
    Buon, Marine
    Seara-Cardoso, Ana
    Viding, Essi
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (06) : 1660 - 1680
  • [5] "I pick you": the impact of fairness and race on infants' selection of social partners
    Burns, Monica P.
    Sommerville, Jessica A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [6] CAMPBELL SB, 1991, INTERNALIZING AND EXTERNALIZING EXPRESSIONS OF DYSFUNCTION : ROCHESTER SYMPOSIUM ON DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, VOL 2, P57
  • [7] The development of moral sense and moral thinking
    Carpendale, Jeremy I. M.
    Hammond, Stuart I.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2016, 28 (06) : 743 - 747
  • [8] Explaining early moral hypocrisy: Numerical cognition promotes equal sharing behavior in preschool-aged children
    Chernyak, Nadia
    Harris, Paul L.
    Cordes, Sara
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (01)
  • [9] "Are You Really Sad?" Infants Show Selectivity in Their Behaviors Toward an Unconventional Emoter
    Chiarella, Sabrina S.
    Poulin-Dubois, Diane
    [J]. INFANCY, 2018, 23 (03) : 453 - 470
  • [10] Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting
    Colquhoun, Heather L.
    Levac, Danielle
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    Straus, Sharon
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Perrier, Laure
    Kastner, Monika
    Moher, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (12) : 1291 - 1294