On Training Sample Memorization: Lessons from Benchmarking Generative Modeling with a Large-scale Competition

被引:19
作者
Bai, Ching-Yuan [1 ]
Lin, Hsuan-Tien [1 ]
Raffel, Colin [2 ]
Kan, Wendy Chih-wen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Google, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
来源
KDD '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING | 2021年
关键词
benchmark; competition; neural networks; generative models; memorization; datasets; computer vision;
D O I
10.1145/3447548.3467198
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many recent developments on generative models for natural images have relied on heuristically-motivated metrics that can be easily gamed by memorizing a small sample from the true distribution or training a model directly to improve the metric. In this work, we critically evaluate the gameability of these metrics by designing and deploying a generative modeling competition. Our competition received over 11000 submitted models. The competitiveness between participants allowed us to investigate both intentional and unintentional memorization in generative modeling. To detect intentional memorization, we propose the "Memorization-Informed Frechet Inception Distance" (MiFID) as a new memorization-aware metric and design benchmark procedures to ensure that winning submissions made genuine improvements in perceptual quality. Furthermore, we manually inspect the code for the 1000 top-performing models to understand and label different forms of memorization. Our analysis reveals that unintentional memorization is a serious and common issue in popular generative models. The generated images and our memorization labels of those models as well as code to compute MiFID are released to facilitate future studies on benchmarking generative models.
引用
收藏
页码:2534 / 2542
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Testing statistical hypotheses
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ARXIV160509782
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV181105512
[4]  
Arjovsky M, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
[5]  
Barratt Shane T., 2018, A note on the inception score
[6]  
Bethge M, 2015, ARXIV151101844 CORR
[7]   Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures [J].
Borji, Ali .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2019, 179 :41-65
[8]  
Brock Andrew, 2018, P 7 ACM INT S PERV D, DOI DOI 10.1145/3205873.3205877
[9]  
Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, P248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
[10]  
Deotte Chris, 2019, DOG MEMORIZER GAN