Application of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI for response monitoring in multiple myeloma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Kaiwen [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Elsa [3 ]
Kenis, Shedrack [4 ]
Hallam, Simon [5 ]
Haroon, Athar [6 ]
Wan, Simon [7 ]
Rabin, Neil [8 ]
Rojas-Garcia, Antonio [9 ]
Padhani, Anwar [10 ]
Adeleke, Sola [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, London, England
[4] Echolab Radiol & Lab Serv, Benin, Nigeria
[5] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Haemato oncol, London, England
[6] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Nucl Med, London, England
[7] UCL & UCL Hosp, Inst Nuclear Med, London, England
[8] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Haemato Oncol, London, England
[9] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Policy Evaluat Unit, London, England
[10] Mt Vernon Hosp, Paul Strickland Scanner Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
[11] Kings Coll London, Sch Canc & Pharmaceut Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[12] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Oncol, London, England
关键词
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Biomarkers; Multiple myeloma; Meta-analysis; TUMOR RESPONSE; DISEASE; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08311-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System recently published provides a framework for the standardised interpretation of DW-WBMRI in response assessment of multiple myeloma (MM) based on expert opinion. However, there is a lack of meta-analysis providing higher-level evidence to support the recommendations. In addition, some disagreement exists in the literature regarding the effect of timing and lesion subtypes on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value changes post-treatment. Method Medline, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception to 20th July 2021, using terms reflecting multiple myeloma and DW-WBMRI. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, data were extracted by two investigators. Quality was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 method. Results Of the 74 papers screened, 10 studies were included comprising 259 patients (127 males and 102 females) and 1744 reported lesions. Responders showed a significant absolute ADC change of 0.21x10(-3) mm/s(2) (95% CI, 0.01-0.41) with little evidence of heterogeneity (Cochran Q, p = 0.12, I-2 = 45%) or publication bias (p = 0.737). Non-responders did not show a significant absolute difference in ADC (0.06 x10(-3) mm/s(2), 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.19). A percentage ADC increase of 34.78% (95% CI, 10.75-58.81) was observed in responders. Meta-regression showed an inverse trend between ADC increases and time since chemotherapy initiation which did not reach statistical significance (R-2 = 20.46, p = 0.282). Conclusions This meta-analysis supports the use of the DW-WBMRI as an imaging biomarker for response assessment. More evidence is needed to further characterise ADC changes by lesion subtypes over time.
引用
收藏
页码:2135 / 2148
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps Integrated in Whole-Body MRI Examination for the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
    Ippolito, Davide
    Casiraghi, Alessandra
    Besostri, Valeria
    Franzesi, Cammillo Talei
    Sironi, Sandro
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) : 1163 - 1171
  • [32] Effect of whole-body vibration on BMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    L. Slatkovska
    S. M. H. Alibhai
    J. Beyene
    A. M. Cheung
    Osteoporosis International, 2010, 21 : 1969 - 1980
  • [33] Diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of primary and metastatic malignancies: A meta-analysis
    Li, Bin
    Li, Qiong
    Nie, Wei
    Liu, Shiyuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 338 - 344
  • [34] Effect of whole-body vibration on BMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Slatkovska, L.
    Alibhai, S. M. H.
    Beyene, J.
    Cheung, A. M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 (12) : 1969 - 1980
  • [35] Comparison of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and PET/CT in lymphoma staging
    Kharuzhyk, Siarhei
    Zhavrid, Edward
    Dziuban, Andrei
    Sukolinskaja, Elena
    Kalenik, Olga
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3915 - 3923
  • [36] Comparison of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and PET/CT in lymphoma staging
    Siarhei Kharuzhyk
    Edward Zhavrid
    Andrei Dziuban
    Elena Sukolinskaja
    Olga Kalenik
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3915 - 3923
  • [37] Association of loss of spleen visualization on whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with prognosis and tumor burden in patients with multiple myeloma
    Terao, Toshiki
    Machida, Youichi
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Tsushima, Takafumi
    Narita, Kentaro
    Ikeda, Daisuke
    Fukumoto, Ami
    Kuzume, Ayumi
    Tabata, Rikako
    Miura, Daisuke
    Takeuchi, Masami
    Matsue, Kosei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [38] Diagnostic significance of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
    Hou, Bo
    Xiang, Shi-Feng
    Yao, Gen-Dong
    Yang, Su-Jun
    Wang, Yu-Fang
    Zhang, Yi-Xin
    Wang, Jun-Wei
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (12) : 11761 - 11769
  • [39] Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI
    Winfield, Jessica M.
    Poillucci, Gabriele
    Blackledge, Matthew D.
    Collins, David J.
    Shah, Vallari
    Tunariu, Nina
    Kaiser, Martin F.
    Messiou, Christina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 1687 - 1691
  • [40] Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI
    Jessica M. Winfield
    Gabriele Poillucci
    Matthew D. Blackledge
    David J. Collins
    Vallari Shah
    Nina Tunariu
    Martin F. Kaiser
    Christina Messiou
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1687 - 1691