Application of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI for response monitoring in multiple myeloma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Kaiwen [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Elsa [3 ]
Kenis, Shedrack [4 ]
Hallam, Simon [5 ]
Haroon, Athar [6 ]
Wan, Simon [7 ]
Rabin, Neil [8 ]
Rojas-Garcia, Antonio [9 ]
Padhani, Anwar [10 ]
Adeleke, Sola [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, London, England
[4] Echolab Radiol & Lab Serv, Benin, Nigeria
[5] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Haemato oncol, London, England
[6] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Nucl Med, London, England
[7] UCL & UCL Hosp, Inst Nuclear Med, London, England
[8] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Haemato Oncol, London, England
[9] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Policy Evaluat Unit, London, England
[10] Mt Vernon Hosp, Paul Strickland Scanner Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
[11] Kings Coll London, Sch Canc & Pharmaceut Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[12] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Oncol, London, England
关键词
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Biomarkers; Multiple myeloma; Meta-analysis; TUMOR RESPONSE; DISEASE; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08311-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System recently published provides a framework for the standardised interpretation of DW-WBMRI in response assessment of multiple myeloma (MM) based on expert opinion. However, there is a lack of meta-analysis providing higher-level evidence to support the recommendations. In addition, some disagreement exists in the literature regarding the effect of timing and lesion subtypes on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value changes post-treatment. Method Medline, Cochrane and Embase were searched from inception to 20th July 2021, using terms reflecting multiple myeloma and DW-WBMRI. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, data were extracted by two investigators. Quality was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 method. Results Of the 74 papers screened, 10 studies were included comprising 259 patients (127 males and 102 females) and 1744 reported lesions. Responders showed a significant absolute ADC change of 0.21x10(-3) mm/s(2) (95% CI, 0.01-0.41) with little evidence of heterogeneity (Cochran Q, p = 0.12, I-2 = 45%) or publication bias (p = 0.737). Non-responders did not show a significant absolute difference in ADC (0.06 x10(-3) mm/s(2), 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.19). A percentage ADC increase of 34.78% (95% CI, 10.75-58.81) was observed in responders. Meta-regression showed an inverse trend between ADC increases and time since chemotherapy initiation which did not reach statistical significance (R-2 = 20.46, p = 0.282). Conclusions This meta-analysis supports the use of the DW-WBMRI as an imaging biomarker for response assessment. More evidence is needed to further characterise ADC changes by lesion subtypes over time.
引用
收藏
页码:2135 / 2148
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI for response monitoring in multiple myeloma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaiwen Wang
    Elsa Lee
    Shedrack Kenis
    Simon Hallam
    Athar Haroon
    Simon Wan
    Neil Rabin
    Antonio Rojas-Garcia
    Anwar Padhani
    Sola Adeleke
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 2135 - 2148
  • [2] Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Early Response Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma: Preliminary Results
    Horger, Marius
    Weisel, Katja
    Horger, Wilhelm
    Mroue, Ali
    Fenchel, Michael
    Lichy, Matthias
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (06) : W790 - W795
  • [3] Role of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of multiple myeloma
    Wang, Jiping
    Zhang, Bei
    Zhang, Rongkui
    Zhang, Li
    Jiang, Wenyan
    Jiang, Yaqiu
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (35)
  • [4] Comparative Performance of Whole-Body MRI and FDG PET/CT in Evaluation of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Response: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rama, Sharath
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Durieux, Jared C.
    Ramaiya, Nikhil H.
    Tirumani, Sree Harsha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 602 - 613
  • [5] Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma
    Julie C. Dutoit
    Koenraad L. Verstraete
    Skeletal Radiology, 2017, 46 : 733 - 750
  • [6] Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma
    Dutoit, Julie C.
    Verstraete, Koenraad L.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (06) : 733 - 750
  • [7] Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma
    Mesguich, Charles
    Hulin, Cyrille
    Latrabe, Valerie
    Lascaux, Axelle
    Bordenave, Laurence
    Hindie, Elif
    Marit, Gerald
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 99 (12) : 2869 - 2880
  • [8] Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma
    Charles Mesguich
    Cyrille Hulin
    Valerie Latrabe
    Axelle Lascaux
    Laurence Bordenave
    Elif Hindié
    Gerald Marit
    Annals of Hematology, 2020, 99 : 2869 - 2880
  • [9] Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Assessment of Treatment Response in Myeloma
    Giles, Sharon L.
    Messiou, Christina
    Collins, David J.
    Morgan, Veronica A.
    Simpkin, Catherine J.
    West, Sharon
    Davies, Faith E.
    Morgan, Gareth J.
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 785 - 794
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosis, staging, and treatment response assessment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Torkian, Pooya
    Mansoori, Bahar
    Hillengass, Jens
    Azadbakht, Javid
    Rashedi, Sina
    Lee, Sarah S.
    Amini, Behrang
    Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
    Chalian, Majid
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (03) : 565 - 583