Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper

被引：6

作者：

Bornmann, Lutz ^{[1
]}

Guns, Raf ^{[2
]}

Thelwall, Michael ^{[3
]}

Wolfram, Dietmar ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Gesell, Sci Policy & Strategy Dept, Hofgartenstr 8, D-80539 Munich, Germany

[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Social Sci, Ctr R&D Monitoring, Middelheimlaan 1, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium

[3] Univ Wolverhampton, Sch Math & Comp Sci, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England

[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, POB 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA

来源：

QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 02期

关键词：

bibliometrics; open access; open data; open peer review; Open Science; scientometrics; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; H-INDEX; IMPACT; UNIVERSITIES; CITATION; RANKING; MODELS;

D O I：

10.1162/qss_e_00121

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Open Science is an umbrella term that encompasses many recommendations for possible changes in research practices, management, and publishing with the objective to increase transparency and accessibility. This has become an important science policy issue that all disciplines should consider. Many Open Science recommendations may be valuable for the further development of research and publishing, but not all are relevant to all fields. This opinion paper considers the aspects of Open Science that are most relevant for scientometricians, discussing how they can be usefully applied.

引用

页码：438 / 453

页数：16

共 68 条

[1] [Anonymous], 1967, POVERTY HIST
[2] Baker M., 2016, Nature, DOI DOI 10.1038/NATURE.2016.20504
[3] Bauer P.C., 2018, WRITING REPRODUCIBLE, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3175518, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3175518]
[4] Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Bornmann, L
Daniel, HD
[J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 65 (03) : 391 - 392
[5] Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
Bornmann, Lutz
Mutz, Ruediger
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (11) : 2215 - 2222
[6] How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings
Bornmann, Lutz
Mutz, Ruediger
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (12) : 2711 - 2713
[7] What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide
Bornmann, Lutz
Stefaner, Moritz
de Moya Anegon, Felix
Mutz, Ruediger
[J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (03) : 581 - 593
[8] A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
Bornmann, Lutz
Mutz, Ruediger
Hug, Sven E.
Daniel, Hans-Dieter
[J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (03) : 346 - 359
[9] Is Interactive Open Access Publishing Able to Identify High-Impact Submissions? A Study on the Predictive Validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by Using Percentile Rank Classes
Bornmann, Lutz
Schier, Hermann
Marx, Werner
Daniel, Hans-Dieter
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (01): : 61 - 71
[10] From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Bornmann, Lutz
Marx, Werner
Schier, Hermann
Thor, Andreas
Daniel, Hans-Dieter
[J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2010, 19 (02) : 105 - 118

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →