Abuse liability assessment of eslicarbazepine acetate in healthy male and female recreational sedative users: A Phase I randomized controlled trial

被引:8
作者
Levy-Cooperman, Naama [1 ,3 ]
Schoedel, Kerri A. [1 ,3 ]
Chakraborty, Bijan [1 ,4 ]
Blum, David [2 ]
Cheng, Hailong [2 ]
机构
[1] INC Res, 720 King St West, Toronto, ON M5V 2T3, Canada
[2] Sunovion Pharmaceut Inc, 84 Waterford Dr, Marlborough, MA 01752 USA
[3] Altreos Res Partners Inc, 50 Wanda Rd, Toronto, ON M6P 1C6, Canada
[4] Inflamax Res, 1310 Fewster Dr, Mississauga, ON L4W 1A4, Canada
关键词
Eslicarbazepine acetate; Abuse liability; Human; Clinical; Alprazolam; Subjective measures; PARTIAL-ONSET SEIZURES; DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; PLACEBO; HUMANS; SAFETY; ADULTS; MONOTHERAPY; ALPRAZOLAM; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rationale: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiepileptic drug for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Adverse events such as dizziness and somnolence reported in clinical studies suggest that ESL has detectable central nervous system (CNS) effects in addition to its antiepileptic effects. This Phase I study evaluated the abuse liability of ESL compared with that of alprazolam (ALP) and placebo (PBO) in recreational CNS depressant users. Methods: In this single-dose, randomized, double-blind, PBO- and active-controlled crossover study, healthy recreational CNS depressant users who could discern between ALP 2 mg and PBO received single oral doses of each of the following treatments with a washout interval of >= 7 days between each treatment: ESL (800 mg, 1600 mg, 2000 mg, and 2400 mg); ALP (1.5 mg and 3.0 mg); and PBO. Subjective measures, including visual analog scales (VASs) e.g., Drug-Liking (primary endpoint), and Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) Morphine-Benzedrine Group (MBG), Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol Group (PCAG), and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Group scales were evaluated at multiple time points up to 24 h postdose. Cognitive effects were evaluated using the Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Divided Attention (DAT) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Task-Revised tests. Principal results: Peak scores for Drug-Liking VAS (maximum effect [E-max]) were significantly higher for both ALP doses than for PBO (p < 0.0001), thereby confirming study validity. Drug-Liking VAS E-max was significantly lower for all ESL doses than both ALP doses (p < 0.0001). Drug-Liking VAS E-max for ESL 800 mg was similar to that for PBO (least squares [LS] mean difference: 3.6; p = 0.19). At the three higher ESL doses (1600 mg and the supratherapeutic doses of 2000 mg and 2400 mg), Drug-Liking VAS E-max was significantly higher than for PBO, although the differences were minimal (IS mean difference: 9.3-133 out of 100). For most secondary subjective endpoints (i.e., Good Effects VAS and High VAS, ARCI-MBG, Take Drug Again VAS, Overall Drug-Liking VAS, and ARCI-PCAG; p < 0.05), the effect of ESL (all doses) was significantly less than that of ALP (both doses). On most secondary measures, the dose-response relationship was relatively flat or showed saturation at higher ESL doses. Although significant differences were observed for ESL compared with those for PBO for some specific CRT and DAT endpoints (i.e., reaction time, manual tracking, hit latency), ALP demonstrated significant and dose-dependent impairment on the majority of cognitive endpoints when compared with PBO and ESL Mean plasma concentrations of the active metabolite of ESL, eslicarbazepine, increased with increasing ESL dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated for eslicarbazepine were generally comparable with results from previous studies in healthy volunteers. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that single doses of ESL may have less abuse liability than ALP in recreational sedative users. Although ESL had detectable subjective effects and showed some drug-'liking' at higher doses, the magnitude of these effects was small. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) in healthy elderly and young subjects
    Almeida, L
    Falcao, A
    Maia, J
    Mazur, D
    Gellert, M
    Soares-da-Silva, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 45 (09) : 1062 - 1066
  • [2] Aptiom, 2013, FULL PRESCR INF
  • [3] Guidelines and methodological reviews concerning drug abuse liability assessment
    Balster, RL
    Bigelow, GE
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 (03) : S13 - S40
  • [4] Eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with partial epilepsy
    Ben-Menachem, E.
    Gabbai, A. A.
    Hufnagel, A.
    Maia, J.
    Almeida, L.
    Soares-da-Silva, P.
    [J]. EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2010, 89 (2-3) : 278 - 285
  • [5] Biton V., 2014, EPILEPSY CURR, V14, P209
  • [6] Brandt J., 1991, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V5, P17
  • [7] Brandt J. B., HOPKINS VERBAL LEARN
  • [8] PHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND ABUSE LIABILITY OF BRETAZENIL, DIAZEPAM, AND ALPRAZOLAM IN HUMANS
    BUSTO, U
    KAPLAN, HL
    ZAWERTAILO, L
    SELLERS, EM
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 55 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [9] The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications
    Comer, S. D.
    Ashworth, J. B.
    Foltin, R. W.
    Johanson, C. E.
    Zacny, J. P.
    Walsh, S. L.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 96 (1-2) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study
    Elger, Christian
    Halasz, Peter
    Maia, Joana
    Almeida, Luis
    Soares-da-Silva, Patricio
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 (03) : 454 - 463