Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting

被引:21
作者
Jordan, Eric J. [1 ]
Fiske, Charles [2 ]
Zagoria, Ronald J. [1 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 505 Parnasssus Ave,M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] RadNet Med Imaging, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging & Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Computed tomography; Angiography; Aortic aneurysm; EVAR; Imaging; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; CANCER; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; FUSION; SYSTEM; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-017-1169-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of PI-RADS v2 to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer (CS-PCa) with magnetic resonance ultrasound (MR/US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies in the non-academic setting. Materials/methods: Retrospective analysis of men whom underwent prostate multiparametric MRI and subsequent MR/US fusion biopsies at a single non-academic center from 11/2014 to 3/2016. Prostate MRIs were performed on a 3-Tesla scanner with a surface body coil. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 scoring algorithm was utilized and MR/US fusion biopsies were performed in selected cases. Mixed effect logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed on PI-RADS v2 alone and combined with PSA density (PSAD) to predict CS-PCa. Results: 170 patients underwent prostate MRI with 282 PI-RADS lesions. MR/US fusion diagnosed 71 CS-PCa, 33 Gleason score 3+3, and 168 negative. PI-RADS v2 score is a statistically significant predictor of CS-PCa (P < 0.001). For each one-point increase in the overall PI-RADS v2 score, the odds of having CS-PCa increases by 4.2 (95% CI 2.2-8.3). The area under the ROC curve for PI-RADS v2 is 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.76) and for PI-RADS v2 + PSAD is 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.82), statistically higher than PI-RADS v2 alone (P < 0.001). The rate of CS-PCa was about twice higher in men with high PSAD (>= 0.15) compared to men with low PSAD (< 0.15) when a PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion was detected (P = 0.005). Conclusion: PI-RADS v2 is a strong predictor of CS-PCa in the non-academic setting and can be further strengthened when utilized with PSA density.
引用
收藏
页码:2725 / 2731
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] AAMC, 2016, KEY FACT TEACH HOSP
  • [2] ACR, 2015, MR PROST IM REP DAT
  • [3] AHA, 2016, FAST FACTS AC HOSP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, SEER stat fact sheets
  • [5] MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SERUM AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    CATALONA, WJ
    SMITH, DS
    RATLIFF, TL
    DODDS, KM
    COPLEN, DE
    YUAN, JJJ
    PETROS, JA
    ANDRIOLE, GL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (17) : 1156 - 1161
  • [6] A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason score
    Fine, Samson W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 1335 - 1338
  • [7] Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) : 1112 - 1121
  • [8] Screening for Prostate Cancer With the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test A Review of Current Evidence
    Hayes, Julia H.
    Barry, Michael J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (11): : 1143 - 1149
  • [9] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kasel-Seibert, Moritz
    Lehmann, Thomas
    Aschenbach, Rene
    Guettler, Felix V.
    Abubrig, Mohamed
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Teichgraeber, Ulf
    Franiel, Tobias
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) : 726 - 731
  • [10] Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Lin, W. C.
    Westphalen, A. C.
    Silva, G. E.
    Chodraui Filho, S.
    Reis, R. B.
    Muglia, V. F.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (11) : 2209 - 2217