Interim Prostate-Specific Antigen: Predicting for Biochemical Failure During Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy

被引:1
作者
Cardoso, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ngo, Diana [1 ]
Lim, Karen [1 ,3 ]
Wong, Karen [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Sidhom, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, Merseyside, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Liverpool, Merseyside, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Liverpool, Merseyside, Australia
[4] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, Australia
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; ADJUVANT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2021.100646
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A subset of patients treated with postprostatectomy radiation therapy for biochemical recurrence after surgery fail to respond because of microscopic disease beyond the irradiated prostate bed. This work aims to determine whether a rising interim prostatespecific antigen (PSA) during radiation therapy can predict the likelihood of subsequent biochemical recurrence. Methods and Materials: Between 2010 and 2016, 185 patients had salvage radiation therapy to a dose of 68 Gy without androgen deprivation therapy for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy. Patients had their PSA recorded on the first day of radiation therapy and again after completing the 25th fraction (of 34 total fractions). Biochemical failure after radiation therapy was defined as a PSA value >0.2 ng/mL within 2 years after radiation therapy. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. Factors with a P value of <.2 in univariate analysis were then used in a multivariate analysis. Results: The 2-year freedom from biochemical failure was 60% (95% confidence interval, 53%-67%). When assessing the interim PSA, 143 patients (77%) had a drop in interim PSA; of these patients, 71% had 2-year biochemical control. Forty-two patients (23%) had a stable or rising interim PSA, and only 24% of these patients had 2-year biochemical control. On multivariate analysis, a drop in PSA during radiation therapy (P < .0001) and a positive surgical margin (P < .0001) were significant factors for freedom from subsequent biochemical failure, and seminal vesicle invasion was associated with biochemical failure at 2 years (P Z .019). All patients with a rising interim PSA, negative surgical margin, and seminal vesicle invasion ultimately had biochemical failure at 2 years. Conclusions: A PSA rise during salvage radiation therapy is prognostic of biochemical failure at 2 years. Factors such as seminal vesicle invasion and a negative surgical margin also predict for poor responders to salvage radiation therapy. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salvage Radiation Therapy for Increasing Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy: Who, When, and How? Reply
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04) : 470 - +
  • [2] Value of Extra-Early Initiation of Salvage Radiation for Increasing Prostate-Specific Antigen After Prostatectomy
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (30) : 3597 - +
  • [3] Impact of Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Persistently Elevated or Rising Prostate-specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy
    Fossati, Nicola
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Colicchia, Michele
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Bossi, Alberto
    Seisen, Thomas
    Di Muzio, Nadia
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Chiorda, Barbara Noris
    Fiorino, Claudio
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Goldner, Gregor
    Joniau, Steven
    Battaglia, Antonino
    Haustermans, Karin
    De Meerleer, Gert
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Ost, Piet
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [4] Prostate-specific antigen is a predictor of the efficacy of salvage radiation therapy in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Bulychkin, P., V
    Tkachev, S., I
    Matveev, V. B.
    Nazarenko, A., V
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2019, 15 (02): : 66 - 72
  • [5] Salvage Radiation in Men After Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure and the Risk of Death
    Cotter, Shane E.
    Chen, Ming Hui
    Moul, Judd W.
    Lee, W. Robert
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    Anscher, Mitchell S.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Walther, Philip J.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (17) : 3925 - 3932
  • [6] Salvage Radiation Therapy for Increasing Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy: Who, When, and How?
    Fossati, Nicola
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Fiorino, Claudio
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04) : 469 - +
  • [7] Evaluation of molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein 2 in predicting biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy
    Wenske, Sven
    Korets, Ruslan
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Fleisher, Martin
    Scher, Howard I.
    Pettersson, Kim
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Lilja, Hans
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 124 (03) : 659 - 663
  • [8] Hypofractionated radiotherapy as salvage for rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy
    Lee, LW
    McBain, CA
    Swindell, R
    Wylie, JP
    Cowan, RA
    Logue, JP
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 16 (08) : 517 - 522
  • [9] Biochemical failure and the temporal kinetics of prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy with androgen deprivation
    Buyyounouski, MK
    Hanlon, AL
    Horwitz, EM
    Uzzo, RG
    Pollack, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05): : 1291 - 1298
  • [10] Salvage radiotherapy in patients with persisting prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Bottke, D
    Wiegel, T
    Höcht, S
    Müller, M
    Schostak, M
    Hinkelbein, W
    ONCOLOGY, 2003, 65 : 18 - 23